• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU225
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Blurred Vision (2137); Visual Impairment (2138)
Date of Event 12/27/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section a-3b patient gender: female.Section a-4 patient weight: unknown/asked information was not provided.Section h-3 device evaluated by manufacturer: the complaint device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of records including device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch report will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
The diu225 model intraocular lens (iol) was implanted in the patient¿s ocular dexter (right eye).Post-operatively, the patient had blurry vision and residual astigmatism.She cannot read the captions on her tv and vision is overall still blurry.The iol was explanted in a secondary surgical procedure and replaced with a zcu225 18.5 diopter iol.There was no incision enlargement, no serious patient injury, no sutures, and no vitrectomy during the lens exchange procedure however, a capsular tension ring, 11.0, was used to help stabilize the capsule.Best spectacle corrected visual acuity (bscv) pre-operative was 20/40 and post-operative was 20/50.Patient visual acuity post-lens exchange at 1 day post op visit was reported as 20/50sc distance.No further information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: may 6, 2025.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: although visual inspection of the suspect product reveal that the complaint lens was received inside a specimen cup, the lens cut and two pieces were received.The two pieces received were coated in viscoelastic residue.The lens pieces were cleaned revealing one lens piece was scratched.Based on the product evaluation, the complaint issues could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Conclusion: based on the investigation, no malfunction or product deficiency was identified.Corrected data: in review, it was noticed that the following information inadvertently was not included in the section "a3b" of the initial mdr report; therefore, the information has been captured in this supplemental mdr report and the following field was updated accordingly: section a3b: gender: cisgender woman/girl all pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc., has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key21861823
Report Number3012236936-2025-000103
Device Sequence Number19981801
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474747081
UDI-Public(01)05050474747081(17)260802
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/17/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/02/2026
Device Model NumberDIU225
Device Catalogue NumberDIU225U175
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/27/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/23/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/17/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/17/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/02/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age58 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceAsian
-
-