• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Ejection Problem (4009)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 03/05/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of records including device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the preloaded lens encountered resistance upon insertion into the eye.The lens was removed and a new lens was successfully inserted.No further information available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: device date returned to manufacturer: april 28, 2025.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection of the complaint device reveal that the lens was stuck to the outside of the handpiece.Ovd was observed distributed throughout the cartridge, indicating that an adequate amount of ovd was used.The cartridge tip was found to be slightly deformed.The lens module was inspected and no issues were observed.No issues were observed with the handpiece or plunger rod.No resistance was felt while advancing the plunger.The lens was visually inspected under magnification revealing that the lens was coated in viscoelastic residue.The lens was cleaned and inspected and damage was observed on the edge of the lens.No further issues were observed.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design issue.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specification.No product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key21862523
Report Number3012236936-2025-000092
Device Sequence Number14626546
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731738
UDI-Public(01)05050474731738(17)271017
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/09/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0190
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/24/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/23/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/17/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/09/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/17/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-