|
(b)(4).Date sent: 4/21/2025.B3: only event year known: 2025.An analysis of the product could not be performed since a physical sample was not received for evaluation.As part of our company quality system process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and distributed to approved specifications.However, if the product is received at a later date, the investigation will be updated as applicable.The manufacturing records were reviewed and the manufacturing/packaging criteria were met prior to the release of this lot.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: how many device caused a burn on the patient? what is the severity of the burn? (please see degrees of burns below and choose one) third degree burn the burn site looks deep, whitening or blackened and charred.What medical intervention was used to treat the burn? (such as salve or stitches) excision besides the burn, did the patient experience any adverse consequence due to the issue? no.Are there any anticipated long-term effects from the burn or injury? no.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
(b)(6).Date sent: 5/19/2025.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: what lot number of the 0014am was used in the procedure that caused the burn? there were 2 tips that the insulation cracked on during the same case.Both were lot 102p9t what pencil was the tip used in the procedure (product code)? ref #e2350h edge covidien rocker switch pencil.Was the crack on the insulation on the distal end or on the tip side? first one was middle of tip, second one was at the distal end (nearest to bovie pencil) any metal used for insertion (kelly clamps, forceps, etc.)? metal retractors were in the patient, however they were reportedly not near the site of the bovie pencil.What is meant by ¿consistent quality issues¿.- i already answered.What was the surgical procedure? mastopexy.When was the crack noticed during the procedure? noticed the crack when the burn happened.Are there any photos of the devices that can be sent? productcomplaint1@its.Jnj.Com.Unfortunately the tech in the case threw away the tip in the sharps container.There are no photos of the device.Any patient consequences reported in the other ¿consistent quality issues¿? no injuries or adverse events reported.The quality issues conveyed were in reference to the electrocautery tip exhibiting inferior quality to other similar brands.
|