| Catalog Number |
ENF401612 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Premature Activation (1484)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/28/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported by the health care professional, during the use of an enterprise2 4mmx16mm intracranial stent (enf401612, 8640232) pre-maturely deployed out of the microcatheter.There was no patient injury reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer ref#: (b)(4).Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Section h3 - the device is available to be returned for evaluation and testing.However, it has not been received to date.If the device returns, a device investigation will be performed.The complaint was submitted with a photograph of the device, which is pending further analysis.The company is seeking this information through the event investigation.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer ref#: (b)(4).Updated sections on this medwatch: b4, g3, g6, h2 and h11.A photo of the complaint device was included in the file where a stent can be seen already detached from the delivery wire.No structural damage was noted on the photo (i.E., no broken struts, no kinks).The delivery wire was seen undamaged.Lake region medical did review the device history records relative to the manufacturing, inspecting and packaging of the lot 8640232.The history records indicate this product was final inspection tested at lake region medical and was determined to be acceptable.The issue reported regarding the stent being prematurely separated from the delivery wire is confirmed based on the detached condition of the stent.This investigation was performed based only on the photo provided.If the product is received after this investigation, an assessment will be performed as per the conditions of the device returned.As part of j&j medtech quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Therefore, no capa activity is required.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer ref# (b)(4).Updated sections on this medwatch: b4, d9, g3, g6, h2, h3 and h11.The product has been returned for evaluation and testing; however, the engineering evaluation has not been completed.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer ref# (b)(4).Updated sections on this medwatch: b4, g3, g6, h2, h3, h6 and h11.The device was returned to j&j medtech for further evaluation.A non-sterile enterprise2 4mmx16mm was received contained in the decontamination pouch.Upon receiving the device, visual inspection was performed, and as seen in the provided picture the stent was already detached from the delivery unit and this was not returned for evaluation.The delivery wire was returned in good condition (i.E., no kink, bent, or elongated).The delivery wire was subjected to dimensional analysis and all measurements were found to be within specification, including those specifications that control the attachment and delivery of the stent.Therefore, device failure is not suspected to be a contributing factor.The customer complaint regarding a premature deployment of the stent was confirmed due to the detached condition of the stent.However, the dimensional analysis performed showed no issues that could have resulted in the premature detachment of the stent.With the information available, the root cause of the failure encountered cannot be determined.It is possible that clinical and procedural factors, including device manipulation and operator's technique, may have contributed to the reported failure.At this time, there is no evidence to support that the issue reported in the complaint is a result of a defect inherently related to the device.The stent and introducer components might have gotten lost sometime during the post-operative handling of the device.If additional information or components are received at a later time, this investigation will be reassessed accordingly.Lake region medical did review the device history records relative to the manufacturing, inspecting and packaging of the lot 8640232.The history records indicate this product was final inspection tested at lake region medical and was determined to be acceptable.As part of the j&j medtech quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no capa activity is required.It should be noted that product failure could be caused by multiple factors.The instructions for use (ifu) do contain the following recommendations: ¿ do not partially deploy the stent from the introducer.¿ confirm the tip of the delivery wire is entirely within the introducer.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer ref#: (b)(4) updated sections on this medwatch: complaint conclusion: as reported by the health care professional, during the use of an enterprise2 4mmx16mm intracranial stent (enf401612, 8640232) pre-maturely deployed out of the microcatheter.There was no patient injury reported.No additional information is available.The device was not returned for analysis; therefore, no further investigation can be performed.A photo of the complaint device was included in the file where a stent can be seen already detached from the delivery wire.No structural damage was noted on the photo (i.E., no broken struts, no kinks).The delivery wire was seen undamaged.Lake region medical did review the device history records relative to the manufacturing, inspecting and packaging of the lot 8640232.The history records indicate this product was final inspection tested at lake region medical and was determined to be acceptable.The issue reported regarding the stent being prematurely separated from the delivery wire is confirmed based on the detached condition of the stent.This investigation was performed based only on the photo provided.If the product is received after this investigation, an assessment will be performed as per the conditions of the device returned.As part of j&j medtech quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Therefore, no capa activity is required.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|