| Catalog Number |
SRM-600 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
| Date of Event |
03/11/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Healthcare professional reported "rupture".This record is for the left side.Device remains implanted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Further information from the reporter regarding event, product, or patient details has been requested.No additional information is available at this time.Reason for reoperation: rupture.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Healthcare professional reported left side rupture and "hole non-specific." device has been explanted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional, changed, and/or corrected data: a4; b5; b6; d6b; h6.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional, changed, and/or corrected data: h.3, h.6 device evaluation: based on the device analysis grid, the assessments of the complaint are: ¿ rupture: observed broken device assessed as unidentified (tear) opening.A workmanship was observed not related to the complaint for a split in patch observed event.A further investigation is requested to analyze the split in patch observed.As per the investigation procedure, creases were completed and none of the observations are found to be potentially related to the manufacturing process, no further actions are required.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Healthcare professional reported "rupture".Healthcare professional reported "ruptured implant after car accident".This record is for the left side.Device has been explanted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A review of the device history record has been completed.No deviations or non-conformances noted.Additional, changed, and/or corrected data: b5, d4, d9, h3, h4, h6.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Healthcare professional reported "rupture".Healthcare professional later reported left side rupture and "hole non-specific." healthcare professional later reported "ruptured implant after car accident".Device has been explanted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Further investigation: the review of the documentation associated to the manufacturing process indicates that all devices involved in this work order were released in accordance with abbvie¿s procedures and were no defects/problems/issues found in the documents or in the personnel training related to the reported event.Additionally, no er/ ncr(s) were identified during the investigation associated with this lot and the complaint.According to the device analysis performed in the laboratory was observed split (ss) in patch area, it is out of specification per qa199.04.The event of rupture was observed, therefore, the reported event was confirmed, however, this workmanship has not relation to reported complaint.A review of the current risk documents pfmea-silicone filled bi and sizer assy rev.8.0 was performed, and the event of split in patch is a known event, for which current process controls and inspections are established to reduce the incidence of this defect.Considering that there is no adverse trend for this type of event, no additional actions are deemed required at this time.The issue with split in patch will continue to be monitored and corrective actions will be taken in the future if deemed appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Healthcare professional reported left side rupture.The device has been explanted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|