| Model Number |
DRT150 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Blurred Vision (2137)
|
| Date of Event |
03/03/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section a2, a3, a3b, a4 and a5: unknown/ asked but not available.Section b3: date of event: unknown, not provided, section d6a: if implanted, give date: unknown, information not provided.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: unknown, information not provided.Section e1: surgeon's phone number: unknown/ asked but not available.Device evaluation: at the time of the investigation, device was not available for evaluation, therefore no testing could be performed.The reported event cannot be confirmed.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the device were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.Conclusion: based on the investigation results there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the preloaded intraocular lens(iol) was explanted from patient's right eye as the patient complained of fogging vision and the distant vision was worse than their near vision.The lens was explanted in a secondary procedure and replaced with a lens from another manufacturer.The patient feels better and seeing better.From additional information it was learnt that drt150 lens had contributed for fogging vision and distant vision.The daily activities were affected.The replaced lens had satisfied/corrected the patient¿s issues (fogging vision and distant vision.There were no debilitating condition in patient.There was no patient injury.There was no medical/surgical intervention required.No other information is available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 4/24/2025.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification was performed on the suspect product and found the lens was received cut in half and coated in viscoelastic residue.The lens halves were cleaned revealing scratches.No further evaluation was performed.Conclusion: no issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issues reported were identified during product evaluation.The other issues observed during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.No product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Corrected data: upon further review it was noted that section g4: pma/510(k) number in the initial mdr was inadvertently submitted missing the ¿p¿ before the numerical value.The complete number is p980040.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|