| Catalog Number |
3543507 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Granuloma (1876); Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360)
|
| Date of Event |
04/01/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was reviewed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre review verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation is in progress.Once completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: silent rupture.Mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.D4: udi: the expiration date is currently not available.Therefore, the full udi is currently not available.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A female patient who underwent breast augmentation primary involving mentor memorygel, 350cc silicone experienced left sided silent rupture post operation.The issue was confirmed through mammogram examination.As a result, patient scheduled for removal surgery on (b)(6) 2025.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On july 2, 2025 mentor became aware that mistakenly didn't update the codes in follow up: (4).Correction: pc anisomastia and pec silent rupture has been removed, and replaced with pc granuloma and pec rupture symptomatic.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Updated device evaluation completed on july 15, 2025: the product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned device revealed that the breast implant had a tear within an area of siltex cracking on the posterior view, measuring approximately 3.0 cm.The evaluation determined that the possible cause of the rupture is consistent with normal wear.Siltex cracking is defined as a material separation occurring in the siltex layer and can eventually progress through the shell of siltex devices.Siltex cracking is ultimately a result of high stresses.Granulomas are noncancerous nodules that are a common tissue reaction to the presence of a variety of foreign materials, such as silicone.The contralateral device was also received (lot number 266017).The patient did not report any issue with this device.Therefore, no further analysis of the contralateral device is required.As part of mentor's quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released according to approved specifications.Based on the results of this investigation, it was determined that the product met the manufacturing release criteria, and that normal wear may have caused the observed defect.No corrective and preventive action (capa) is required now.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Per additional information received on may 28, 2025, the patient's surgery has been rescheduled to (b)(6) 2025.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Per additional information received on july 1, 2025, the mammogram examination showed left sided gel bleed.As a result, patient underwent left sided implant capsulectomy, and bilateral replacements with mentor boost 340ml moderate plus implant: (r/ (b)(6), l/ (b)(6)).Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Suspect device received on june 23, 2025.Device evaluation completed on june 30, 2025: the product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned device revealed that the breast implant had a tear within an area of siltex cracking on the posterior view, measuring approximately 3.0 cm.The evaluation determined that the possible cause of the rupture is consistent with normal wear.Siltex cracking is defined as a material separation occurring in the siltex layer and can eventually progress through the shell of siltex devices.Siltex cracking is ultimately a result of high stresses.The contralateral device was also received (lot number 266017).The patient did not report any issue with this device.Therefore, no further analysis of the contralateral device is required.As part of mentor's quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released according to approved specifications.Based on the results of this investigation, it was determined that the product met the manufacturing release criteria, and that normal wear may have caused the observed defect.No corrective and preventive action (capa) is required now.The serial number of the device updated to (b)(6).Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|