|
This case is a foreign case outside the usa, in united kingdom.On 25-mar-2025, the mhra authority notified teoxane geneva about an adverse event.According to the information received, a patient was injected with: 0.9 ml of teosyal puresense ultra deep in the cheeks on (b)(6) 2025 using the bolus technique and with the needle supplied in the box.(rc/2503091) 2.4 ml of rha 4 in the cheeks, nasolabial folds, oral commissures, chin and jaw on (b)(6) 2025 using the bolus, retrotracing and fanning techniques and with the needle supplied in the box.(rc/2503092).Unspecified quantity of rha 3 in the nasolabial folds and marionette lines on (b)(6) 2023 (current complaint).During 3 weeks after the last injections, the patient did not experience any reaction.On (b)(6) 2025, the patient experienced firmness of the filler and reported that the filler was "odd/strange/unusual".The injector was not able to receive the patient for a consultation but advised anti histaminic treatment (fexofenadine).One day after, on (b)(6) 2025, the patient experienced a whole face swelling and firmness of severe intensity causing difficulty to open the mouth (due to tightness).The patient went to a&e where she was prescribed steroids treatment (prednisolone 40 mg for 5 days) and she was advised to continue the anti-histaminic treatment.Blood test including immunology testing were done (no results were shared).Considering the severity of the reaction the case was assessed as reportable.After 5 days of corticosteroids (prenisolone), the symptoms improved but on (b)(6) 2025, when treatment was stopped the symptoms reappeared with higher intensity (less intense than the first time).The patient had a review at the clinic with the injector and assessed the filler almost solid and confirmed the patient was very swollen.During the consultation the patient also mentioned she experienced intermittent oedemas.The patient was prescribed a new course of steroids (prednisolone 30 mg for 5 days).After 5 days of treatment, on (b)(6) 2025, the filler was dissolved with 4 vials of hyaluronidase.Since the filler was still firm and difficult to dissolve, a new weaning dose of steroids was prescribed to get the filler softer and the inflammatory process switched off.One week later, on (b)(6) 2025, a new vial of hyaluronidase was injected since the inflammatory process was switched off, the swelling subsided and the gel was very soft.The filler was fully dissolved.The patient was still under weaning regime of steroids; a new assessment will be done once the treatment is finished.Considering the resolution of the symptoms, the case was closed.
|
|
Delayed inflammatory reactions that may manifest as facial oedema, swelling and induration weeks to years after injection are well-known and documented reactions in the context of hyaluronic acid dermal filler injections.They may be related to a delayed immune response or to a bacterial infection.They can be triggered by patient predisposition, trauma, vaccines, or infections.With medical treatment, symptoms can be quickly fully resolved, without sequelae.In addition, the risk of such reactions is mentioned in the instructions for use of products.
|