| Catalog Number |
NSLX125C |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding (1888)
|
| Date of Event |
03/13/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Death
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a thin vessel was sealed with cove and after 24h massive bleeding occurred.When opening the patient, it was identified that the sealed vessel was open.The patient died.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 4/22/2025.D4 batch #: unknown.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: what were the indications for surgery? lung nodules were the hemostasis issues identified post operatively or intra operatively? post-operative.Were any surgical clips used in the area of the device firing? after opening the shears, it was necessary to place a clip.What was the total estimated blood loss (ml)? bleeding after opening the seal is estimated at 2 liters.Was a transfusion required? yes.What was the pre and postoperative anti-coagulant and pain management protocol? no information.Was there calcification of tissue that impeded clamping or cutting? no information were there any pre-exiting patient conditions? coagulopathy please provide a timeline of events.After the clamping of the vessels and artery, after 1 hour of the procedure the artery clamping opened.Two clips were placed in the site and there was hemostasis.In the case of the seal of the enseal, after 24 hours bleeding and opening of the seal were identified.Is there an autopsy report available? no.An analysis of the product could not be performed since a physical sample was not received for evaluation.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformance were identified.As part of our company quality system process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and distributed to approved specifications.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 5/2/2025.Additional information was obtained: the issue was with the enseal that was the device with the one he did hemostasis once the stapler didn¿t work, the patient bled 24 hours post-op in the place he did the hemostasis with the enseal.The coagulation test of the patient were normal but one relative accepted that the patient have had a coagulopathy once in her life, which was no noted in her medical history.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 5/22/2025.Additional information was obtained: an external rapid response call was held on (b)(6) 2025 to discuss the hemostasis issue and the patient¿s unfortunate passing.The surgeon provided a summary of the events.When stapling and cutting the bronchi during the right lobectomy, it started to bleed.He had to open the surgery to put some clips in to stop the bleeding.After completing the procedure, the patient went to the icu.The intubation tube was removed the next morning.In the afternoon, the surgeon told the patient about the procedure.At about 8pm the patient had cough and seizers and bled 1.5 liters of blood.He took the patient back into surgery.He saw that the artery where the enseal was used in the original procedure (not the stapler) was bleeding.It was a different vessel than was bleeding in the original procedure.The surgeon attempted to suture the bleed, but the patient ultimately passed.When talking with a relative, the relative did indicate that the patient had coagulopathy issues in the past, but this was not known during either procedure.The surgeon indicated that he was taking small branches with the enseal.The seal just failed; it was closed/seal when the original procedure was completed.He confirmed the post-op bleeding came from exactly where he used the enseal.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|