• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT AORTIC PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT AORTIC PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 2700
Medical Device Problem Codes Calcified (1077); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure (4446); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 01/17/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was learned through the implant patient registry that a 23mm 2700 aortic valve was explanted after an implant duration of nine (9) years, five (5) months due to unknown reason.The explanted valve was replaced with a 23mm 11500a valve.The implantation data card indicated that the patient was taken to recovery post procedure.Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry.This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional 'customer complaint'.The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: the subject device is not available for evaluation as it was discarded.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: the investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was learned through the implant patient registry and medical records that a 23mm 2700 aortic valve was explanted after an implant duration of nine (9) years, five (5) months due to calcification, thickened leaflet, and severe stenosis.The patient presented with symptoms of heart failure - shortness of breath and fatigue.The explanted valve was replaced with a 23mm 11500a valve.The implantation data card indicated that the patient was taken to recovery post procedure.The patient was discharged on pod #7.Per medical records, the patient underwent redo avr and mvr procedure.The mvr was performed with a non-edwards bioprosthetic valve.Annular stitches were placed in the horizontal mattress non-pledgeted fashion.The aortic annulus was sized to a 23mm inspiris valve and implanted.The valve tested well.The lung was injured a little bit on the left side, so a straight tube was placed.The patient was weaned off bypass.Protamine was administered.The patient was transferred to the icu in stable condition.Per pathology report, the bioprosthetic heart valve demonstrated an annular base and three delicate pink-tan focally thickened valves.Sections of prosthetic tissue demonstrated calcification.No acute inflammation or vegetation seen.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: updated sections g3, h6 (investigation findings, investigation conclusions).Svd is a logical and expected consequence of the chemical, mechanical, and immunological processes associated with bhv implantation.The common endpoint of all these factors is calcification and degradation.Svd is an acquired condition, intrinsic to bioprosthetic valves, characterized by deterioration of the leaflets or supporting structures, leading to thickening, calcification, tearing, or disruption of the prosthetic valve materials.These changes result in valvular dysfunction manifesting as stenosis and/or regurgitation with a consequent drop in hemodynamic efficacy of the valve.Despite the advancements in the heart valve industry, svd commonly begins 7- 8 years after implantation, with a considerably increased rate in patients with pertinent comorbidities and/or an implant duration of greater than 10 years.Prior investigations and extensive literature review have shown that svd is predominantly related to patient factors and implant duration rather than to manufacturing issues.Events related to device design, manufacturing, or use error tend to manifest at an earlier implant duration.There is no evidence to suggest a manufacturing defect caused or contributed to the reported event.Based on the information available, the most likely root cause is patient factors, including an implant duration of 7 or more years and chronic kidney disease (ckd).The instructions for use (ifu) have been reviewed, and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.The reported type of event is included in the ifu.The device history record (dhr) was not reviewed as the reported event does not allege a malfunction that could be related to an edwards manufacturing deficiency and/or one was not suspected or confirmed through investigation, no labeling non-conformance/deficiency; no use-related issue with a hazardous situation; no device-related infection; and no evidence of a product failure with regard to design, reliability, or use error.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT AORTIC PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS
Common Device Name
REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
mle fl2 - office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key21883558
Report Number2015691-2025-03121
Device Sequence Number7653845
Product Code DYE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103021608
UDI-Public(01)00690103021608(17)190412
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P860057
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2015
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/28/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/12/2019
Device Model Number2700
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/29/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/23/2025
05/28/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/22/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/15/2025
05/28/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured04/13/2015
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Life Threatening; Hospitalization;
Patient Age84 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-