| Catalog Number |
217863136 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/27/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # :(b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.H11 additional narrative: d4: udi: as the lot number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during preparation of the femoral stem, the reamer adapter and 20 mm reamer began to slip at the connection between the two.Upon inspection after the case, both show signs of wear and should be replaced.Additionally, the rp attune tibial impactor broke while implanting the the tibial tray.This split into 2 pieces and no pieces were left in the patient.This caused a 30 second delay and had no ill effect on the patient or outcome.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information that has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H11 additional narrative: added: d4 lot, d9, h4.If information that was not available for the initial report is obtained, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: it was reported that during preparation of the femoral stem, the reamer adapter and 20 mm reamer began to slip at the connection between the two.Upon inspection after the case, both show signs of wear and should be replaced.Additionally, the rp attune tibial impactor broke while implanting the tibial tray.This split into 2 pieces and no pieces were left in the patient.This also needs to be replaced.This caused a 30 second delay and had no ill effect on the patient or outcome.The product was returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics for evaluation.Visual inspection found modified hudson adapter shows signs of worn consistent with the time of service and use.No problems detected since no defects; malfunctions were observed.A dimensional inspection was not performed since it was not applicable to the complaint condition.A functional test was performed using the returned part (mbt revision reamer 20mm) as the mating component.Functional test revealed devices could fully engage together, as of the modified hudson adapter could be assembled with the reamer of the mbt revision reamer 20mm.The overall complaint was not confirmed as the observed condition of the modified hudson adapter would have not contributed to the complained issue.Based on the investigation findings, the potential cause is traced to end of life, and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is required.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.H11 additional narrative: corrected: h3.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|