• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT PLUS MITRAL PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT PLUS MITRAL PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 6900P
Medical Device Problem Codes Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Dyspnea (1816); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 04/03/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: the investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a patient with a 25mm 6900p mitral valve underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of five (5) years, one (1) month due to unknown reason.The procedure was performed with a 26mm 9755rsl transcatheter valve successfully with good result.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: multiple requests for additional information have been performed; however, the healthcare provider has not provided any additional details regarding this event.Although the reason for the valve explant is unknown, there was no indication or allegation of a device malfunction and/or deficiency contributing to the event.The reported event cannot be confirmed with the available information.The root cause of this event remains indeterminable.The subject device was not returned evaluation as it is unknown when/where the device was explanted; therefore, the complaint cannot be confirmed.The device history record (dhr) review was completed and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.There were no issues identified that would have impacted this event.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.If new information becomes available, a supplemental report will be submitted.Updated sections: h6 (investigation finding, and investigation conclusion).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Pannus is a non-immune inflammatory reaction of the body to the implanted prosthesis, characterized by proliferation of fibroelastic tissue and collagen, with a starting point in the suture area and subacute or chronic centripetal evolution.Pannus can have both beneficial and harmful effects depending on the amount of growth and location.A small amount of host tissue growth over the suture line is expected and is needed to form a non-thrombogenic surface and complete the healing process after device implantation.In contrast, an excessive amount of pannus growth can cause nonstructural dysfunction that may require intervention.Host tissue growth can extend onto the cusp surfaces leading to thickening of the cusps, cusp retraction or curling, leaflet immobility, and/or abnormal coaptation, potentially resulting in valvular regurgitation, elevated gradients, and/or stenosis.Pannus/host tissue overgrowth is most likely due to patient factors and is unlikely to be related to a manufacturing non-conformance.There is no evidence to suggest a manufacturing defect caused or contributed to the reported event.The most likely root cause is patient factors.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.If new information becomes available, a supplemental report will be submitted.Updated sections: b5, b7, h4, and h6 (clinical code, device code, type of investigation, investigation finding, and investigation conclusion).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a patient with a 25mm 6900p mitral valve underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of five (5) years, one (1) month due to pannus growth and stenosis.The patient presented with shortness of breath and orthopnea.The tmvr procedure was successfully performed with a 26mm 9755rsl valve with good result and the patient was discharged on pod #5.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT PLUS MITRAL PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS
Common Device Name
REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492500222
MDR Report Key21894473
Report Number2015691-2025-03181
Device Sequence Number11623702
Product Code DYE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103152630
UDI-Public(01)00690103152630(17)200926
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOH
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P860057
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2020
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/06/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/26/2020
Device Model Number6900P
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/03/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/30/2025
06/05/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/23/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/05/2025
06/07/2025
Date Device Manufactured09/27/2016
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Life Threatening; Hospitalization;
Patient Age79 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-