|
ASCENSION ORTHOPEDICS, INC. 42MM REVERSE LINER +6 S RETENTIVE; PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, NON-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
LNR0990-200-426SR |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Joint Dislocation (2374); Joint Laxity (4526)
|
| Date of Event |
04/08/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, after an rsa performed on an unspecified date, the patient presented shoulder pain and instability.The surgeon suspects a liner disassociation from the stem, based on imaging.A revision surgery is scheduled for mid (b)(6).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal reference number: (b)(4).H11: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a patient complication reported that includes reference to the use of a smith+nephew product without evidence about a specific product problem.The reported complication relates to known inherent procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to confirm a relationship between the reported event and the device or identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: a1, a2, a3, b3, b5, b7, d1, d4, d6b, d10, e1.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, after an rsa revision performed on (b)(6) 2024, the patient presented shoulder pain and instability.The surgeon suspects a liner disassociation from the stem, based on imaging.A second revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2025.It had been emphasized that this patient was admittedly non-compliant with his post-op instructions.The patient had been given some rom/movement restrictions and had been repeatedly ignoring said restrictions.The current health status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3, h6: the devices were not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that although non-adherence to post-operative restrictions is a suspected contributing factor to the reported events, a definitive clinical root cause of the disassociation could not be determined based on the information provided.Deformation of the explanted liner is noted in the provided photos; however, a component malperformance cannot be confirmed.A review of the production orders did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part numbers over the past 12 months and for the batch numbers based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed devices.A review of the instructions for use documents for aetos¿ shoulder system revealed that modular components must be assembled securely to prevent disassociation.Avoid repeated assembly and disassembly of the modular components which could compromise a critical locking action of the components.Additionally, periodic, long-term follow-up is recommended to monitor the position and state of the prosthetic components.This has been identified as an intraoperative and postoperative precaution.A review of the risk management files revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to these products and event.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the products failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include injury, patient condition, postoperative care, size selected or abnormal loading of limb.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|