• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MC3 INC. MC3 ECMO OXYGENATOR; OXYGENATOR, LONG TERM SUPPORT GREATER THAN 6 HOURS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MC3 INC. MC3 ECMO OXYGENATOR; OXYGENATOR, LONG TERM SUPPORT GREATER THAN 6 HOURS Back to Search Results
Model Number 48145
Medical Device Problem Code Air/Gas in Device (4062)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 04/23/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during priming of the mc3 nautilus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ecmo) oxygenator, an air bubble could not be removed from the pre-membrane side prior to use.The air bubble was jumping around.Additionally, when challenged with an injection of 20mls of air at 5l/min with the yellow vent cap off, air came out the arterial side instead of venting out the hydrophobic membrane as expected.The device was replaced.There was no patient involved.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information b5.The priming protocol/method was priming by gravity to fill the nautilus oxygenator, then recirculation at 5 l/min.The air is residual from the priming process and couldn't be removed from the inlet side of the membrane through the hydrophobic membrane vent.Medtronic received additional information that the issue occurred while setting up extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ecmo).The customer observed unusual air collection in oxygenator.Air appeared to be stuck in a layer of plastic that should be sealed, presumably with a collection of fluid.The customer was able to tilt and clear the air back out through the inlet to the oxygenator.The customer was able to recreate issue next day by introducing air into circuit.Additionally, it was noted that the oxygenator was handling air poorly.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation summary: visual inspection shows the housing is broken off and the qb-inlet port is also broken off.With the inlet port broken off testing can not be performed.Evidence of a bubble has been provided.Reason for return was visually confirmed by the evidence that was provided.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MC3 ECMO OXYGENATOR
Common Device Name
OXYGENATOR, LONG TERM SUPPORT GREATER THAN 6 HOURS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MC3 INC.
2555 bishop circle west
dexter MI 48130
Manufacturer (Section G)
MC3 INC.
2555 bishop circle west
dexter MI 48130
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key21908012
Report Number3011468686-2025-00027
Device Sequence Number8729021
Product Code BYS
UDI-Device Identifier10854916006888
UDI-Public10854916006888
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCA
PMA/510(K) Number
K191935
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/17/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2026
Device Model Number48145
Device Catalogue Number48145
Device Lot Number2409360
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/23/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/25/2025
05/22/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/25/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/21/2025
06/17/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/30/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-