• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDSHAPE, INC. ACTIVE ADAPTIVE; IMPLANT FAILURE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDSHAPE, INC. ACTIVE ADAPTIVE; IMPLANT FAILURE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1200-01-1226
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Failure of Implant (1924); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 06/26/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document as soon as it becomes available.
 
Event or Problem Description
Revision surgery - due to implant failure.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
See h6, and h11.This complaint was opened from a report of a dynanail ttc revision surgery in which the implant failed.The parts were returned to be evaluated and investigated by engineering.Based on the evaluation and investigation of the returned samples, there was no abnormalities, breakages or defects noted on the device that would have led to needing a removal surgery.The information provided on the case from the reporter also made no note to the reason of needing the removal surgery.For these reasons, the probable root cause for the implant needing to be removed in unknown.The dynanail design risk matric was reviewed and the potential effect of a revision surgery is documented and accounted for under two-line items.The failure mode of a screw backing out of a bone is ranked with a detection score of 2, patient severity of 3 (device severity of 3) and occurrence of 1.The applicable potential cause is documented as insufficient friction of screw threads to bone.Additionally, another potential failure that could result in revision surgery is end caps becoming loose after insertion.This potential failure is ranked with a detection score of 2, patient severity of 2 (device severity of 2) and occurrence of 1.Potential causes of failure include insufficient torque during insertion, low friction between endcap threads and sliding element.Other potential failures that could drive the need of a revision surgery for removal include if the patient has an infection, if they are requiring a new surgery with different hardware or if there was a non-union.Since the probable root cause is unknown, the specific reason for failure is undetermined.A historical search in the time frame of 04/04/2024 to 04/03/2025 was conducted and revealed that there were 10 cases of dynanail ttc revision surgery executed to remove hardware for various reasons including this complaint.Breakdown of the ten (10) complaints are as follows: two (2) non-compliance, two (2) infection, three (3) unknown, one (1) pain, one (1) nail break, and one (1) instrument related.The hazard is an anticipated risk within the risk analysis matrix, and a without a probable root cause this is not an indication of a systematic issue necessitating a capa investigation.Therefore, no further action is needed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACTIVE ADAPTIVE
Common Device Name
IMPLANT FAILURE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDSHAPE, INC.
1575 northside dr. nw
suite 440
atlanta GA 30318
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDSHAPE, INC.
1575 northside dr. nw
suite 440
atlanta GA 30318
Manufacturer Contact
stacey bonnell
1575 northside dr nw
suite 440
atlanta, GA 30318
4847879764
MDR Report Key21915078
Report Number3007593722-2025-00006
Device Sequence Number7238279
Product Code HSB
UDI-Device IdentifierM97012000112260
UDI-PublicM97012000112260
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateLA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
D155711
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/19/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number1200-01-1226
Device Lot NumberD0101E
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/03/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/20/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/25/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/19/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
1200-02-5030 LOT: C6236I.; 1200-02-5045 LOT: C6224B.; 1200-03-5110 LOT: 03108R.; 1200-04-0000 LOT: 17906.
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age55 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-