|
|
| Catalog Number |
VCP371H |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a c-section procedure on an unknown date and suture was used.In c/section case we had a suture needle tip snapped intraoperatively.The surgical team noted it at time of surgery and were able to retrieve the needle tip.There were no patient consequences reported.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 4/28/2025.H6 component code: g07002 - pending evaluation of returned device this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.Additional information was requested, the following was obtained: did the needle fall into the patient? yes if so, was the needle piece(s) retrieved during the same procedure? yes.Were x-rays taken to locate the needle piece(s)? unknown.What measures were implemented to retrieve the broken piece? unknown ¿ was there any additional tissue damage resulting from the search for the needle piece? unknown - does a fragment of the needle remain in the patient¿s tissue? no if so, is there any plan in place to remove the needle piece in the future? if so, could you please provide the scheduled date for the removal? in which tissue structure was the broken needle located? what is the surgeon's opinion of the potential consequences for the patient? a device has been received, however it has not yet been evaluated.Any further information derived from the evaluation will be submitted in a supplemental 3500a form.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.H3 investigation summary: the product was returned to ethicon for evaluation.One representative unopened sample was received for analysis.Product code vcp371h.Upon initial inspection of the sample, no external damages were observed on the external packet.In order to evaluate the condition of the returned sample, the packet was opened.The swage and attachment area were noted to be as expected.The tip and body of the needle was examined under magnification and no defects or needle breakage were found.In addition, the sample was tested by resistance test to needle and met the requirements.As part of ethicon quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Although no conclusion could be reached on the cause of the reported event, the instructions for use do contain the following caution: to avoid this kind of damage: grasp the needle in an area one-third (1/3) to one-half (1/2) of the distance from the attachment end to the point.The event described could not be confirmed as the device performed without any difficulties noted.Although no product defect was identified, there may have been other circumstances or issues that occurred during the use of the device that could not be replicated during the laboratory analysis.H3 investigation summary: the product was returned to ethicon for evaluation.One needle -suture piece was received for analysis.Product code vcp371h.Upon visual inspection of the sample, the needle was observed to be broken at the tip area.Besides that, significant tooling marks that appear to be by use of the surgical instrument were observed on body needle.The sample will be shipped to hsa for further analysis due to the needle breakage.As part of our quality process, the manufacturing records of this lot-serial number were reviewed, and the manufacturing standards were met prior to the release of this batch.No conclusion could be reached due to the sample needs additional evaluation by hsa.As part of the ethicon quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4) date sent to the fda: 6/19/2025.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.H6 component code: g07002 no device problem found.Corrected information: h6 investigational codes follow up 1.Additional information: h3, h6.H3 investigational summary: the product received for analysis was vcp371h.Visual inspection and metallurgical analysis were performed on the returned product.A fracture was observed at the tip of the needle.One side of the needle was received; the mating fracture surface was not provided for this evaluation.A scanning electron microscope was used to examine the fracture surfaces and surrounding area of the needle.The fracture surfaces were examined in multiple locations to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation revealed the fracture was composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile fracture mode.Mechanical damage observed coincidental to the fracture provides additional evidence that the failure was induced by mechanical deformation leading to ductile overload.This was a ductile fracture.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|