|
H3: device evaluated by mfg: device evaluation anticipated but not yet begun.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
As reported, prior to use for an unknown procedure, a micropuncture transitionless stiffened cannula access set¿s wire guide was found to be unraveled.Per the reporter, approximately 1.5-centimeters of the wire tip was unraveled and elongated upon opening the device package.The device did not make patient contact, and another device of the same type was used to complete the procedure.The patient did not require any additional procedures or experience any adverse effects due to this event.
|
|
Summary of event: as reported, prior to use for an unknown procedure, a micropuncture transitionless stiffened cannula access set¿s wire guide was found to be unraveled.Per the reporter, approximately 1.5-centimeters of the wire tip was unraveled and elongated upon opening the device package.The device did not make patient contact, and another device of the same type was used to complete the procedure.The patient did not require any additional procedures or experience any adverse effects due to this event.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection of the complaint device was also conducted, as well as a supplier investigation.The complaint device was returned to cook for investigation.The wire was unraveled beginning at the distal solder joint, and the mandril, which measured 6-millimeters in length, protruded from the wire.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device history record found no relevant non-conformance's on the lot.A review of complaint history found no additional relevant complaints for this lot number.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A supplier investigation was conducted.The supplier concluded that the device was manufactured to specification.The information provided upon review of the dmr, dhr, and investigation of the returned device suggests that there is evidence the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of non-conforming devices in-house or in the field.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that a component failure, unrelated to manufacturing or design deficiencies, contributed to this event.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|