| Model Number |
M001394250080600 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Difficult to Insert (1316); Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/31/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the tip broke.An 8mm x 60 cm embold soft coil was selected for use in a splenic embolization procedure.During the procedure, the tip broke due to difficulty re-capturing into the introducer sheath.The device was exchanged for another one, and the procedure was successfully completed.There were no patient complications as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the tip broke.An 8mm x 60 cm embold soft coil was selected for use in a splenic embolization procedure.During the procedure, the tip broke due to difficulty re-capturing into the introducer sheath.The device was exchanged for another one, and the procedure was successfully completed.There were no patient complications as a result of this event.It was further reported that the tip of the coil did not break.Instead, the issue was difficulty inserting into the hub of the microcatheter due to a curled tip as well as difficulty re-sheathing the coil into the introducer sheath.This event occurred outside the body, and the device was not used inside the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device eval by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis with the embold delivery wire reinserted backwards in the delivery sheath.The perforations remained intact.Microscopic examination revealed a stretched coil while in the delivery sheath.Couplers were bent but held together by the delivery wire with the coil still connected.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the tip broke.An 8mm x 60 cm embold soft coil was selected for use in a splenic embolization procedure.During the procedure, the tip broke due to difficulty re-capturing into the introducer sheath.The device was exchanged for another one, and the procedure was successfully completed.There were no patient complications as a result of this event.It was further reported that the tip of the coil did not break.Instead, the issue was difficulty inserting into the hub of the microcatheter due to a curled tip as well as difficulty re-sheathing the coil into the introducer sheath.This event occurred outside the body, and the device was not used inside the patient.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|