| Model Number |
N/A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Extravasation (1842); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
|
| Date of Event |
04/08/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The date of event was not provided by the complainant/reporter, the date reflected in this report is the date bd became aware of the event.The manufacturer has received the sample and will be evaluated.A supplemental will be submitted with evaluation results.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by the customer "ct scan was performed with high-pressure injection.The ct tech recognized that the image was lacking contrast resolution and check the patient's arm and noticed large amount of swelling above the insertion site.We were called to replace the line, i requested the nurse save the catheter and not perform a guidewire exchange.The patient needed a ct scan.My recommendation was to replace the line in the other arm with a different lot number.No other information was provided.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information received 21-apr-2025: customer clarified and confirmed the reported issue is a catheter fracture and not a guidewire fracture.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The complaint of a leak in the catheter was confirmed.The product returned for evaluation was one 4fr sl powerpicc solo catheter.The damage observed in the returned sample was characteristic of over-pressurization (burst) damage.This can occur through the use of syringes smaller than 10 ml, by flushing against an occlusion, or due to excessive force applied during infusion procedures.The returned product sample was evaluated and a split was observed between the 5 cm and 6 cm depth markings.This catheter damage was typical of a burst, and the characteristics observed which supported this type of failure included: 's' shaped split.Tensile weakness at the fracture site (due to material ballooning prior to burst).Granular fracture surface texture (typical of tearing failure modes).The catheter material was visibly lighter in color at the fracture site.An examination of the catheter structure revealed no potential damage/defect related to manufacture of the product.This complaint will be recorded for future trending and monitoring purposes.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|