|
ETHICON INC. SURGICEL FIBRILLAR 4X4IN(10.2CMX10.2CM); AGENT, ABSORBABLE HEMOSTATIC, NON-COLLAGEN BASED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
1963 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Fever (1858); Impaired Healing (2378); Post Operative Wound Infection (2446); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
02/25/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4) h6.Component code: g07002 - device not returned.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.1.Please provide the following patient demographic information, if available: age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure? 2.Please provide any relevant patient history: patient pre-existing medical conditions (i.E.Allergies, history of reactions), all concomitant medications, past medical history, any treatment required for events, dose, frequency, and therapy dates.3.Was there any intraoperative concurrent use of other products? 4.What was the intended use of the surgicel? was it used to address active bleeding or used prophylactically? 5.Where was the surgicel used (on what tissue)? 6.How much surgicel was used during the procedure? 7.Was the surgicel product left in place? was the excess irrigated and removed? 8.What were current symptoms following the index surgical procedure? onset date? 9.Has any surgical or medical intervention been performed? 10.What is physician¿s opinion as to the cause of this event? 11.Was there an alleged deficiency of the surgicel that contributed to the patient¿s post-operative event? 12.What is the patient¿s current status? 13.What is the users experience w/ surgicel powder and other hemostatic agents? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a lumbar spine posterior robot assisted decompression, bone grafting, fusion, internal fixation, and prp implantation procedure under general anesthesia on (b)(6) 2025, and absorbable hemostat was used.The patient was hospitalized on (b)(6) 2025, due to lumbar disc herniation.Absorbable hemostatic gauze were used during the surgery, and the surgery went smoothly with good postoperative recovery.The patient was discharged for rehabilitation and exercise treatment; after the patient was discharged, the patient suddenly developed a high fever.The wound was regularly cleaned and dressing changed.During the dressing change, it was found that there was a wave sensation in the wound area.Continuing the wound cleaning and dressing change, the patient went to the local hospital for further treatment and underwent wound fluid extraction surgery.However, the wave sensation still existed in the wound.Therefore, the patient contacted our department and was readmitted for further treatment on (b)(6) 2025 due to wound infection.After completing relevant examinations, surgical contraindications were ruled out and debridement and irrigation surgery were performed.After this surgery, the patient's wound has healed well.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint:(b)(4).A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch and no non-conformances were identified.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Additional information: h10 related report number.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint#: (b)(4).Corrected information: b 5.Event description.Corrected b 5.Event description: poor wound healing.This case is from health authority.The patient was hospitalized on (b)(6) 2025 due to lumbar disc herniation.On (b)(6) 2025, under general anesthesia, the patient underwent lumbar posterior robot assisted decompression, bone graft fusion, internal fixation, and prp implantation.The surgery was performed using absorbable hemostatic fluid and absorbable hemostatic during the surgery, and the surgery was successful with good postoperative recovery.The patient was discharged for rehabilitation and exercise treatment; after the patient was discharged, the patient suddenly developed a high fever.The wound was regularly cleaned and dressing changed.During the dressing change, it was found that there was a wave sensation in the wound area.Continuing the wound cleaning and dressing change, the patient went to the local hospital for further treatment and underwent wound fluid extraction surgery.However, the wave sensation still existed in the wound.Therefore, the patient contacted our department and was readmitted for further treatment on (b)(6) 2025 due to wound infection.After completing relevant examinations, surgical contraindications were ruled out and debridement and irrigation surgery were performed.After this surgery, the patient's wound has healed well.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: product code:1963, lot: 1036cp and product code: ms0010, lot: 275858 were used in one operation.The following information was requested, but unavailable: how much surgiflo was used? was surgiflo removed or left in the patient after hemostasis? what is the surgeon¿s opinion of why the patient experienced the poor wound healing/infection? please elaborate on the hospital status? a lot of cases regarding poor wound healing/infection originates from the same hospital (b)(6).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|