• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US AGGRESSIVE 4.0MM 5PK; ARTHROSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US AGGRESSIVE 4.0MM 5PK; ARTHROSCOPE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 283419
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Date of Event 01/01/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during an unknown surgery it was observed that the aggressive 4.0mm device had metal shedding.It was reported that shavings fell inside the patient and the surgeon used suction to clean up and most shavings were removed.There was no delay in the procedure reported.There were no adverse patient consequences reported.No additional information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device history review: there was no non-conformance regarding this lot the product has not returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics; however, a photo was provided for evaluation.Visual inspection of the returned photo found that arthroscopic space had metallic particles.No other anomalies could be observed.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the aggressive 4.0mm 5pk would have contributes to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, the potential cause can be traced to blade wear and degradation.As per ifu, excessive side loading may result in blade wear and degradation.Adequate suction is recommended to reduce wear and degradation of the device, and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H11 additional narrative: the product was returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics for evaluation.Visual inspection found that the device had the inner shaft had foreign matter particles, presumably metal debris upon visualization under magnification.The outer shaft had friction marks.No other anomalies were noted.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the aggressive 4.0mm 5pk would have contributed to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, the potential cause can be traced to blade wear and degradation.As per instructions for use, excessive side loading may result in blade wear and degradation.Adequate suction is recommended to reduce wear and degradation of the device, and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H11 additional narrative: d9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the device has been evaluated, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AGGRESSIVE 4.0MM 5PK
Common Device Name
ARTHROSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 
3035526892
MDR Report Key21932948
Report Number1221934-2025-01517
Device Sequence Number21031668
Product Code HRX
UDI-Device Identifier10886705022021
UDI-Public(01)10886705022021(10)M2408008(17)290731
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountrySN
PMA/510(K) Number
K041824
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/30/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number283419
Device Lot NumberM2408008
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/08/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/05/2025
06/06/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/30/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/05/2025
06/09/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/16/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-