| Catalog Number |
139105EXT |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Fragmentation (1261)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
| Date of Event |
04/09/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reported device is being returned to conmed for evaluation.A supplemental and final report will be filed following the completion of the device evaluation and complaint investigation.We will continue to monitor per regulatory requirements to help ensure patient safety.Device not yet returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Conmed japan reported on behalf of the customer that the 139105ext, accessory electrode coated needle was being used on (b)(6) 25 during a resection of head tumor procedure when it was reported ¿a physician was using 20a 139105ext and closed the wound on a patient without noticing that the tip was broken.After closing the wound, he discovered that the tip of the product was broken.After the surgery, an x-ray was performed, but the tip could not be found.The surgery was completed without finding it, and the patient was informed that there was a possibility that the product was left behind.¿.The procedure was completed without the use of an alternate device.There was no report of injury, medical intervention, or extended hospitalization for the patient.This report is being raised on reported injury due to the possibility of the patient retaining a foreign body.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Conmed japan reported on behalf of the customer that the 139105ext, accessory electrode coated needle was being used on (b)(6) 2025 during a resection of head tumor procedure when it was reported ¿a physician was using a 139105ext and closed the wound on a patient without noticing that the tip was broken.After closing the wound, he discovered that the tip of the product was broken.After the surgery, an x-ray was performed, but the tip could not be found.The surgery was completed without finding it, and the patient was informed that there was a possibility that the product was left behind.¿.The procedure was completed without the use of an alternate device.There was no report of injury, medical intervention, or extended hospitalization for the patient.This report is being raised on reported injury due to the possibility of the patient retaining a foreign body.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Reported event of ¿tip of the product was broken, there was a possibility that the product was left behind¿ was confirmed.Examination of returned used device 139105ext found that the tip had been fractured, but the part of the tip that had broken off was not returned.Visual inspection also found that the blue material covering the electrode was loose and could be completely removed.A root cause cannot be determined; however, based upon evaluation of the device, a possible cause of this event could be that the device was pushing against other devices during manipulation.The manufacturing documents from the device history record have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of the product.The product released for distribution was found to have met all specifications prior to shipment.(b)(4).Per the instructions for use, the user is advised that improper electrode installation may result in injury to the patient or operating room personnel by arcing at the pencil/electrode connection.We will continue to monitor per regulatory requirements to help ensure patient safety.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|