| Catalog Number |
398.880 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
04/09/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2025, when the broken pelvic reduction forceps which one of the parts of instrument set, was going to be replaced.It was confirmed that the size of another pelvic reduction forceps which supposed to be into the set instead of the broken one had been changed and unable to be placed in the case.No further information is available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H11 additional narrative: h3, h4, h6: the product was returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics for evaluation.Visual inspection of the returned device found both handles were deformed.Furthermore, the spindle holder was also observed loose.Even though, breakage was not identified, due to the condition of the device, the reported event can be confirmed.The observed condition of the device can be consistent with a component failure that was caused by exposure to unintended forces during handling or accidental impact.Therefore, with available information a complete potential cause remains undetermined.A dimensional inspection was unable to be performed due to the post-manufacturing damage.A functional evaluation was performed attaching the spindle to the spindle holder and failed due to loose condition.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the pelvicreducforceps lrg adjust speed-lock would have contributed to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history review part number: 398.880.Lot number: t119394.Manufacturing site: tuttlingen.Release to warehouse date: 17-aug-2015.A review of the device history records was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.The raw material certificate was reviewed and the used material was according to the specification of the device.Dhr review retrieved from pi-17447379634210670 as the impacted products share the same lot number.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information received states that this event has no surgery involvement and no other medical intervention required.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H11 additional narrative: added: b5, d10.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H3, h6: photo investigation: the product was not returned to medtech orthopaedics; however, photos were provided for review.The photo investigation revealed the device was observed aside from another set of forceps, however due to photo quality, no breakage was identified.Furthermore, a length variation between the two forceps was noted, attributed to differences in design from their respective years of manufacture.Consequently, the reported condition can not be confirmed.As the device was not returned, an as-received condition could not be assessed, and a dimensional inspection and document/specification review were not completed.The overall complaint was not confirmed as the observed condition of the pelvicreducforceps lrg adjust speed-lock would have not contributed to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history review (dhr): part number: 398.880, lot number: 5002482, manufacturing site: synthes austria, release to warehouse date: 11-dec-2003.A review of the device history records was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformance's were identified.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H3, h4, h6: photo investigation: the product was not returned to medtech orthopaedics , however photos were provided for review.The photo investigation revealed the device was observed aside from another set of forceps, however due to photo quality, no breakage was identified.Furthermore, a length variation between the two forceps was noted, attributed to differences in design from their respective years of manufacture.Consequently, the reported condition can not be confirmed.As the device was not returned, an as-received condition could not be assessed, and a dimensional inspection and document/specification review were not completed.The overall complaint was not confirmed as the observed condition of the pelvicreducforceps lrg adjust speed-lock would have not contributed to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Physical device investigation: the product was returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics for evaluation.Visual inspection of the returned device found breakage was not identified.Therefore, the reported condition can not be confirmed.Furthermore, both handles were observed deformed.The spindle holder was also found loose from it's position.The observed condition of the device can be consistent with a component failure that was caused by exposure to unintended forces during handling or accidental impact.A dimensional inspection was performed to the device total length and a variation of 0.82 mm was found, this can be attributed to the bending condition of the handles.Overall, the device is consistent with manufacturing specifications.A functional evaluation was performed attaching the spindle to the spindle holder and failed due to loose condition.The overall complaint was not confirmed as the observed condition of the pelvicreducforceps lrg adjust speed-lock would have not contributed to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history review (dhr): part number: 398.880 lot number: 5002482 manufacturing site: synthes austria release to warehouse date: 11-dec-2003 a review of the device history records was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|