| Model Number |
DBEC-125 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Myocardial Infarction (1969)
|
| Date of Event |
06/07/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A corrective and preventative actions (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.The production records for this product could not be reviewed and a similar complaint query could not be performed because the part number and/or lot number was not reported, and the device was not returned.Based on the information received, the investigation determined that the reported patient myocardial infarction and serious injury appear to be related to operational context.In this case it is likely that the reported patient myocardial infarction and serious injury are a result of the patient¿s disease severity combined with use techniques employed; however, since the device was not returned this could not be confirmed.Based on the results of the complaint investigation, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.D4: the udi number is not known as the part and lot number were not provided.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
(b)(4) - it was reported a diamondback 360 coronary orbital atherectomy device (oad) was used to treat a 70% stenosed, heavily calcified mid left anterior descending artery (lad).Three low speed treatments were performed.There were no device malfunctions or patient complications identified post orbital atherectomy treatment.The clinical event committee reviewed the images and concluded that the use of the diamondback 360 coronary orbital atherectomy device may have contributed to a myocardial infarction.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was not returned for analysis.Production record and corrective and preventative actions (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a query of the complaint handling database for the reported lot revealed there is no indication of a lot specific issue.Based on the information received, the investigation determined that the reported patient myocardial infarction and serious injury appear to be related to operational context.In this case it is likely that the reported patient myocardial infarction and serious injury are a result of the patient¿s disease severity combined with use techniques employed; however, since the device was not returned this could not be confirmed.Based on the results of the complaint investigation, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Ecl-014-028 - it was reported a diamondback 360 coronary orbital atherectomy device (oad) was used to treat a 70% stenosed, heavily calcified mid left anterior descending artery (lad).Three low speed treatments were performed.There were no device malfunctions or patient complications identified post orbital atherectomy treatment.The clinical event committee reviewed the images and concluded that the use of the diamondback 360 coronary orbital atherectomy device may have contributed to a myocardial infarction.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was not returned for analysis.Production record and corrective and preventative actions (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a query of the complaint handling database for the reported lot revealed there is no indication of a lot specific issue.Based on the information received, the investigation determined that the reported patient myocardial infarction and serious injury appear to be related to operational context.In this case it is likely that the reported patient myocardial infarction and serious injury are a result of the patient¿s disease severity combined with use techniques employed; however, since the device was not returned this could not be confirmed.Based on the results of the complaint investigation, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.D4: correction to catalog number.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported a diamondback 360 coronary orbital atherectomy device (oad) was used to treat a 70% stenosed, heavily calcified mid left anterior descending artery (lad).Three low speed treatments were performed.There were no device malfunctions or patient complications identified post orbital atherectomy treatment.The clinical event committee reviewed the images and concluded that the use of the diamondback 360 coronary orbital atherectomy device may have contributed to a myocardial infarction.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|