| Model Number |
G32006 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
04/10/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A zilver635 10mm x 60mm was inserted along the guidewire (terumo/radiforcus rf-pa35153/0.035inch).The red safety lock was released at the target site and the handle was pulled, but the stent did not deploy, perhaps because it was stuck.Therefore, it was removed from the body.As the same part number was not available, a zilver635 10mm x 80mm was placed and the procedure was completed.No health hazard.1 was the device used percutaneously? yes.5 was the device flushed through both flushing ports before the procedure, as per ifu? yes.6 details of the wire guide used (name, diameter, hyrdophyllic)? terumo/radiforcus rf-pa35153/0.035inch.7 was the patient's anatomy tortuous or calcified? unknown.8 was resistance encountered when advancing the wire guide or delivery system to the target location? no.11 did the tip of the delivery system cross the target location? yes.12 are images of the device of procedure available? no.13 did the user pull the handle toward the hub during deployment and delivery system was not pushed during deployment? yes.14 was pre-dilation performed ahead of placement of the stent? no.15 was post-dilation performed after the placement of the stent? no.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluation.The zib6-40-10.0-60 device of lot number c2027535 involved in this complaint was returned for evaluation, with its opened original packaging.With the information provided, a physical examination and document-based investigation was conducted.The device related to this occurrence underwent a laboratory evaluation on the 07 may 2025.Refer to ¿product returns¿ section for lab attendance and notes.The returned device lab examination findings and observations can be referred through attached photos.On evaluation of the device, the following was observed: visual inspection: red safety tab not returned.Handle in pre-deployed position kink noted directly below white connector cap.No other damage noted.Functional inspection: device flushes with no issue.0.035inch wire guide unable to pass beyond kink noted directly below white connector cap.Unable to deploy stent.The reported failure was confirmed.Manufacturing records review: prior to distribution all devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional inspection to ensure device integrity.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.Historical data review: the review of the relevant manufacturing records confirms the failure mode has not previously occurred for this work order.Instructions for use and/label review: the japanese packaging insert (c-ci0405d13) supplied with the device complies with mhlw law no.84 of 2013 which avoids including information that is not specific to the medical device or that which is basic knowledge already understood by the healthcare professional, to ensure to accurately convey all the information that is important for the user.Image review: an image was not returned for evaluation.Root cause analysis: a definitive root cause could not be determined.A possible root cause could be attributed to device handling and/or difficult patient anatomy.It is possible that the flexor kinked if the handle was not adequately supported during the procedure or when advancing to the target location due to a tortuous path.From the additional questions it is unknown if the patient¿s anatomy was tortuous or calcified.As a result of the kink, the stent could not be deployed.Confirmation of complaint: complaint is confirmed based on visual and/or functional inspection.Confirmed quantity of 01 x used device.Corrective action/correction: complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for similar events.Summary of investigation: according to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.The procedure was completed using another device.Investigation findings conclude that a possible root cause could be attributed to device handling and/or difficult patient anatomy.Complaint is confirmed based on visual and/or functional inspection.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for similar events.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Supplemental report is being submitted due to the completion of the investigation on 11-jul-2025.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|