| Catalog Number |
0112970 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Scar Tissue (2060); Hernia (2240)
|
| Date of Event |
08/05/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-may-2019) is considered to be a best estimate.This emdr represents perfix plug (device #2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent perfix plug (device #1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Per medical records: (b)(6) 2019- patient was diagnosed with symptomatic inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic left inguinal herniorrhaphy with repair of both direct & indirect defects using two perfix plugs & patch (device #1 & #2).Per operative notes, ¿an incision was made in the left inguinal region.The hernia sac was dissected away.A perfix plug (device #1) was placed into the internal ring.There was also a direct defect for which a perfix plug & patch (device #2) was placed around the cord structures using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2020- patient was diagnosed with recurrent left inguinal hernia thereby underwent repair.Per operative notes, ¿incision was made through the previous left inguinal incision.Dissection was carried through dense scar.Noted a small hernia defect noted along the cord structures.For this, a polypropylene mesh plug was able to be placed, and it was able to be secured.¿.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2019- patient was diagnosed with symptomatic inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic left inguinal herniorrhaphy with repair of both direct & indirect defects using two perfix plugs & patch (device #1 & #2).Per operative notes, ¿an incision was made in the left inguinal region.The hernia sac was dissected away.A perfix plug (device #1) was placed into the internal ring.There was also a direct defect for which a perfix plug & patch (device #2) was placed around the cord structures using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2020- patient was diagnosed with recurrent left inguinal hernia thereby underwent repair.Per operative notes, ¿incision was made through the previous left inguinal incision.Dissection was carried through dense scar.Noted a small hernia defect noted along the cord structures.For this, a polypropylene mesh plug was able to be placed, and it was able to be secured.¿.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Addendum #1: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-may-2019) is considered to be a best estimate.Addendum #2: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Updated fields: d3, e.1 (complainant name, complainant phone #, complainant facility, complainant e-mail address), g6, h2, h10.This supplemental emdr represents perfix plug (device #2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent perfix plug (device #1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|