• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 PERFIX PLUG; SURGIAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 PERFIX PLUG; SURGIAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0112970
Medical Device Problem Codes Defective Device (2588); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Scar Tissue (2060); Hernia (2240)
Date of Event 08/05/2020
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-may-2019) is considered to be a best estimate.This emdr represents perfix plug (device #2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent perfix plug (device #1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
Per medical records: (b)(6) 2019- patient was diagnosed with symptomatic inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic left inguinal herniorrhaphy with repair of both direct & indirect defects using two perfix plugs & patch (device #1 & #2).Per operative notes, ¿an incision was made in the left inguinal region.The hernia sac was dissected away.A perfix plug (device #1) was placed into the internal ring.There was also a direct defect for which a perfix plug & patch (device #2) was placed around the cord structures using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2020- patient was diagnosed with recurrent left inguinal hernia thereby underwent repair.Per operative notes, ¿incision was made through the previous left inguinal incision.Dissection was carried through dense scar.Noted a small hernia defect noted along the cord structures.For this, a polypropylene mesh plug was able to be placed, and it was able to be secured.¿.
 
Event or Problem Description
Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2019- patient was diagnosed with symptomatic inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic left inguinal herniorrhaphy with repair of both direct & indirect defects using two perfix plugs & patch (device #1 & #2).Per operative notes, ¿an incision was made in the left inguinal region.The hernia sac was dissected away.A perfix plug (device #1) was placed into the internal ring.There was also a direct defect for which a perfix plug & patch (device #2) was placed around the cord structures using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2020- patient was diagnosed with recurrent left inguinal hernia thereby underwent repair.Per operative notes, ¿incision was made through the previous left inguinal incision.Dissection was carried through dense scar.Noted a small hernia defect noted along the cord structures.For this, a polypropylene mesh plug was able to be placed, and it was able to be secured.¿.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Addendum #1: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-may-2019) is considered to be a best estimate.Addendum #2: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Updated fields: d3, e.1 (complainant name, complainant phone #, complainant facility, complainant e-mail address), g6, h2, h10.This supplemental emdr represents perfix plug (device #2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent perfix plug (device #1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.Not returned.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PERFIX PLUG
Common Device Name
SURGIAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
4018258495
MDR Report Key21950052
Report Number1213643-2025-090192
Device Sequence Number8802643
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741016677
UDI-Public(01)00801741016677(17)240528(10)HUDS1699
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StatePR
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K922916
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2019
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/12/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/28/2024
Device Catalogue Number0112970
Device Lot NumberHUDS1699
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/24/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/24/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/02/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/12/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/15/2019
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age57 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-