|
|
| Catalog Number |
VCP335H |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4) h6 component code: g07002 - device not returned.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained via: please confirm, when did the alleged deficiency occurred (removal from package / during handling prior to use on patient/ during passage through tissue / during tying / post-op)? post tying broken when placing into needle holder.If the alleged deficiency occurred during use on the patient, please provide the following information: no did the needle piece fall into the patient? if yes, was\were the needle piece(s) retrieved during the same procedure? were x-rays taken to locate the needle piece(s)? what measures were taken to retrieve the broken piece(s)? was there any additional tissue damage as a result of searching for the needle piece(s)? please provide the status of the device(s) as it has not been received for analysis.If the device has been shipped, please provide the shipment tracking details.- shipment being sent this afternoon with tracking number (b)(4) provide the source or name and title of external person providing answers to follow-up (external person submitting answers to sales rep).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an unknown procedure in 2025 and suture was used.During the procedure, it was reported to the sales rep by the surgeon that after the suture was used the surgical tech had put the suture in the needle holder and noticed the tip had broken off and was also in the needle holder.Both the suture and the needle tip are both in the magnetic suture holder.The procedure was completed successfully with no adverse consequences for the patient.One device returning.There were no adverse reported.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 5/29/2025.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information: d9, h3, h6.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.H3 investigational summary: according to the information, it was reported breakage needle.Visual inspection and metallurgical analysis were performed on the returned product.A fracture was observed at the tip of the needle.One side of the needle was received, the mating fracture surface was not provided for this evaluation.A scanning electron microscope was used to examine the fracture surfaces and surrounding area of the needle.The fracture surfaces were examined in multiple locations to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation revealed the fracture was composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile fracture mode.Mechanical damage observed coincidental to the fracture provides additional evidence that the failure was induced by mechanical deformation leading to ductile overload.This was a ductile fracture.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|