|
Additional information provided in h.6.And h.11.No product has been returned to the investigation site for evaluation; therefore, the condition of the product could not be verified.This is a 63-year-old female patient who was scheduled for a combined cataract/vitrectomy procedure in the left eye (os) ocular sinister.A corneal burn was observed during the cataract portion of the case.This patient was previously diagnosed with cataract and diabetic retinopathy and was later listed as ¿recovered with sequelae.¿ additional related information was requested but none has been provided to date.Corneal thermal injuries are typically related to excessive heat generated by the phacoemulsification tip due to insufficient aspiration flow, extended energy application, or combination of both.The system is designed to cool the phacoemulsification tip during use as aspirated fluid flows through the tip lumen.Overheating of the phacoemulsification tip, however, may occur due to extended application of ultrasonic energy or compromised aspiration flow through the phacoemulsification tip.Reduced fluid flow through the phacoemulsification tip may be caused by phacoemulsification tip reuse, tip clogging by nuclear material, kinked tubing, inadequate flow and vacuum settings, or obstruction by ophthalmic viscoelastic device (ovd).When the phacoemulsification tip is occluded, infusion will cease, reducing the cooling effect of the tip.Occlusion tones (intermittent beeping tones during occlusion) alert the user, indicating that the vacuum is near or at its preset limit, and aspiration flow is reduced or stopped.The surgeon must recognize the occlusion tones and manually stop the ultrasound mode in order to prevent a rapid temperature increase.Corneal burn is an issue that is occasionally reported with cataract surgery and most corneal burns can be traced to issues related to surgical technique and not to malfunctioning equipment.The investigation conducted a non-conformance review of the reported lot number.No deviations that could have contributed to this event were identified and all corresponding production release specifications defined in the device master record were met.Based on the available information and no materials received for product evaluation, the root cause of this occlusion, corneal opacity with corneal burn event is inconclusive.No further investigative or manufacturing actions are warranted at this time due to the product not being returned to the manufacturing site for testing.Receipt of additional relevant information or supporting materials will prompt a re-evaluation of the complaint investigation.Complaint data for all company products is reviewed monthly to monitor for adverse trends.During the last review, no adverse trends were observed for the reported product and event combination.Quality assurance has reviewed this complaint and will continue to monitor data for evidence of adverse trending and take further action, as appropriate.No further action warranted at this time.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).H.10 reflects all related report numbers associated with this product event that have been submitted at this time.
|