|
(b)(4).Date sent: 5/2/2025.D4: batch# unk.An analysis of the product could not be performed since a physical sample was not received for evaluation.The manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.The manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.As part of our company quality system process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and distributed to approved specifications.The following information has been requested.To date, no response has been received.Should further details be obtained, a supplemental report will be submitted.What were the indications for surgery? what surgical procedure was performed? did the patient receive any preoperative chemotherapy or radiation? what is the product code of the device that was utilized in the surgery? what is the lot/batch number? were there any issues experienced with the device in the initial surgical procedure? what healthcare professional fired the device and what is his/her experience with the device? did the healthcare professional wait 15 seconds after closing the device before firing? were there any issues with opening the device? if yes, what trouble shooting steps were used to open the device? were there any issues noted with staple formation at any point throughout the care of the patient? if so, please describe the shape and location.What color reloads were used and what was the sequence of the firings? was a leak test performed? if so, what type and what was the result? was the staple line visualized endoscopically during the initial surgical procedure? how many days postoperative did the leak occur? how was the leak identified? what was observed at the site of the leak upon reoperation? how was the leak addressed? what is the current status of the patient? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 5/23/2025.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: this file was reviewed by a cross functional team during the weekly adverse event review and additional information is requested: what were the indications for surgery? intraoperative extemporaneous histological what surgical procedure was performed? lobectomy.Did the patient receive any preoperative chemotherapy or radiation? no.What is the product code of the device that was utilized in the surgery? yes.What is the lot/batch number? c9ey6t ech60s 312d32 gst60b.Were there any issues experienced with the device in the initial surgical procedure? no.What healthcare professional fired the device and what is his/her experience with the device? the fissure.Did the healthcare professional wait 15 seconds after closing the device before firing? yes of course.Were there any issues with opening the device? if yes, what trouble shooting steps were used to open the device? no.Were there any issues noted with staple formation at any point throughout the care of the patient? if so, please describe the shape and location.No the staple line was perfect what color reloads were used and what was the sequence of the firings? gst60b blu.Was a leak test performed? if so, what type and what was the result? yes and it was perfect.Was the staple line visualized endoscopically during the initial surgical procedure? why? they make an open procedure.How many days postoperative did the leak occur? 3 days after.How was the leak identified? air leak from digital system drain medela drenaggio 140 ml /min.What was observed at the site of the leak upon reoperation? the patient wasn¿t reoperate.How was the leak addressed? they alternated a drain and the patient stay a long term in hospital.What is the current status of the patient? now he is good.
|