• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION, INC. LVIS; STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION, INC. LVIS; STENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 214035-LVIS-D-PMA
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Muscle Weakness/Atrophy (1967); Cerebral Edema (4403); Ruptured Aneurysm (4436); Facial Paralysis (4585); Aneurysm expansion (4597); Diplopia/Double Vision (4802)
Date of Event 08/07/2019
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported for a patient enrolled in the lvis pas study: cerebral edema.Event location: ipsilateral to target lesion.Admission due to worsening ataxia, diplopia, right facial droop, and eyelid dysfunction [neurological deficit].For scanning, received brain cta, mri brain, and dsa.Grade 3 severity: severe or medically significant but not immediately life threatening.Hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization indicated.Date of index procedure: (b)(6) 2019.Event onset date: august 7, 2019.Patient admitted, worked up, given steroids for mass effect and cerebral edema.Outcome: ae cerebral edema was reported as with outcome of resolved with sequelae on (b)(6) 2019.Relatedness: disease related, relatedness: study device related.Additional information reported: patient has another ae reported details below: event summary: the patient was admitted on (b)(6) 2020 (pod 314), for facial weakness, dysphagia and vomiting.After craniotomy for vertebrobasilar aneurysm clipping, cta showed new arterial filling within the aneurysm.New nonocclusive thrombus in sigmoid sinus.Received following imaging on (b)(6) 2020: cta brain, mri brain with and without contrast, mra head with and without contrast, neuro cerebral angio, ct head without contrast, cta head.Imaging noted giant basilar artery aneurysm.Symptoms lasted more than 24 hours.Treated with surgery of right retro-sigmoid craniectomy for clipping of giant vertebrobasilar aneurysm with the use of temporary clips for temporary occlusion of parent vessels.Subject¿s neurological status did not improve off sedation after debulking/temporary clipping surgery.Patient¿s family transitioned the subject to comfort cares.The patient died on (b)(6) 2020.Site reported: grade 5 severe, sae with outcome of death on (b)(6) 2020 site reported relatedness: disease related.Site reported relatedness: study procedure related for aneurysm retreatment.Site reported: patient death not related to the study device.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation findings: based on a review of the device¿s risk documentation, the reported event did not indicate there were the presence of any potential or new manufacturing, design, quality, or other systemic issues, or non-conformances.The complaint code is monitored through the trending process; corrective action is determined, as needed, through this process.Investigations of historic complaint files with similar complaint category coding are recorded in the complaint handling system; without the ability to perform an analysis of the device, this investigation cannot identify with certainty any potential root causes.Batch review: a search for non-conformances associated with this part / lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.Complaint system review: there are no similar complaints based on the complaint category regarding this batch number from the last two years recorded in the complaint system at the time of this investigation.Ifu review (additional information can be found in the ifu): potential adverse events the following potential risks and complications associated with general anesthesia, cerebral angiography, intracranial catheterization, intracranial stent placement or intra-saccular coil deployment have been identified below: allergic reaction, including but not limited to: contrast dye, nitinol metal, and any other medications used during the procedure.Aphasia.Blindness.Cardiac arrhythmia.Coil prolapsed or migration into normal vessel adjacent to aneurysm.Complications of arterial puncture including pain, local bleeding, local infection and injury to the artery, vein or adjacent nerves.Cranial neuropathy.Death.Device fracture, migration or misplacement.Dissection or perforation of the parent artery.Headache.Hemorrhage (i.E., intracerebral hemorrhage (ich), subarachnoid hemorrhage (sah), or retroperitoneal (or in other locations); hemiplegia; hydrocephalus; infection; injury to normal vessel or tissue; ischemia; mass effect; myocardial infarction; neurological deficits; occlusion of non-target side branches; pseudo aneurysm formation; reactions to anti-platelet/anti-coagulant agents; reactions due to radiation exposure; reactions to anesthesia and related procedures; reactions to contrast agents; renal failure; aneurysm rupture; stenosis of stented segment; seizure; stent thrombosis; stroke or tia (transient ischemic attack); thromboembolic event (t/e); vasospasm; visual impairment.Warnings should unusual resistance be felt at any time during access or removal, the introducer/guide catheter/microcatheter and lvis device should be removed as a single unit.Applying excessive force during delivery or retrieval of the lvis device can potentially result in loss or damage to the device and delivery components.It is imperative to use the lvis device with compatible microcatheters.If repeated friction is encountered during lvis device delivery, verify microcatheter is not kinked or in extremely tortuous anatomy.Confirm that the microcatheter does not ovalize.Confirm that there is adequate sterile flush solution.Do not reposition the lvis device in the parent vessel without fully retrieving the device.The lvis device must be retrieved into the microcatheter and re-deployed at the desired target location or removed completely from the patient.Precautions: exercise caution when crossing the deployed/detached lvis device with adjunctive devices such as guidewires, catheters, microcatheters or balloon catheters to avoid disrupting the device geometry and device placement.Directions for use 15.Advance the delivery wire to transfer the lvis device from within the introducer into the microcatheter.Warning: do not torque the delivery wire while advancing or retracting the lvis device.A torque device should not be used.16.Continue advancing the delivery wire into the microcatheter until the proximal tip of the delivery wire enters the introducer.Loosen the rhv locking ring, remove the introducer, and set it aside.Warning: do not apply undue force.If resistance is encountered at any point during lvis device delivery or manipulation, withdraw the unit and select a new lvis device.18.Position the lvis device for deployment by aligning the lvis implant distal radiopaque end markers approximately 7 mm past the aneurysm neck.Note: a proper push/pull technique, encompassing sufficient delivery wire push force, in addition to an opposing microcatheter withdrawal force, will facilitate properly deploying the lvis device to achieve full expansion and good vessel apposition.Note: slowly advancing the lvis device while adjusting the microcatheter position will ensure accurate deployment.Maintain simultaneous control of the lvis device and microcatheter in order to position and expand the device at the proper location.Caution: using a rapid microcatheter withdrawal technique to deploy the lvis device is not recommended and may result in device elongation.19.If lvis device positioning is not satisfactory, the lvis device may be recaptured and repositioned if it is not fully deployed.The lvis device may be recaptured until the point where the proximal end of the lvis device markers is aligned 3 mm proximally with the microcatheter distal marker band (approximately 80% deployed).Caution: if resistance is felt while recapturing the lvis device, do not continue to recapture the device.Withdraw the microcatheter slightly to unsheath the lvis device (without exceeding the recapture limit), and then attempt to recapture the lvis device.Caution: the lvis device must not be re-deployed more than three times.Note: the lvis device delivery wire should not be utilized as a guidewire after stent deployment.Do not torque the lvis device.A torque device should not be used.20.If lvis device positioning is satisfactory, carefully retract the microcatheter and advance the delivery wire together, to allow the lvis device to deploy across the neck of the aneurysm.Ensure the device proximal radiopaque end markers are approximately 7 mm proximal to the aneurysm neck to ensure an adequate landing zone.The lvis device will expand and total length may foreshorten up to 60% from its undeployed length (refer to tables 1) as it exits the microcatheter.Ensure microcatheter is retracted and clear from the proximal flared ends.Note: visualize and refer to the implant radiopaque end markers to maintain adequate implant length, approximately 7 mm on each side of the aneurysm neck or target location to ensure appropriate neck coverage.Warning: do not detach the lvis device if it is not properly positioned in the parent vessel.Observe the delivery wire distal tip to assure it remains within the desired location of the parent vessel.21.Prior to removing the delivery wire and if necessary, carefully position the microcatheter distal to the lvis device to maintain access through the lvis device.Remove and discard the delivery wire.Warning: the lvis device delivery wire should not be utilized as a guidewire.Do not torque the lvis device.A torque device should not be used.Investigation conclusion: the physical device was not available for evaluation to investigate if a condition existed that would have contributed to the reported event.Supplemental imaging was also unavailable for review; without imaging, the investigation cannot verify the event occurred as described, nor could the investigation further examine the cause of the reported event.This information may be updated if additional information is provided at a later date.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: b5.Describe event or problem: report of aneurysm rupture during recurrent treatment.B6.Relevant tests/laboratory data, including dates.H6.Adverse event problem: health effect ¿ impact and clinical codes.This study is ongoing and device / procedure relatedness determinations can be re-adjudicated by independent reviewers / physicians.The study device and study procedure relatedness can change as a result of these reviews.Microvention is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by microvention, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Microvention has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, microvention, or its employees that the device, microvention, or its employees caused or contributed to the event described in the report.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional reporting for the patient enrolled in the lvis pas study that there was a recurrence of the target midline basilar aneurysm eleven months post index procedure.During the operative procedure to treat the midline basilar target aneurysm recurrence, due to extreme fragility of the aneurysmal wall, the target aneurysm ruptured.The surgeons could not reconstruct the wall and clip the aneurysm in order to stop the bleeding and prevent fatal blood loss.The lumen of the aneurysm was packed with cottonoids and clips were applied on the walls of the aneurysm to clip cottonoid in place.The patient passed away shortly after this procedure.The midline basilar aneurysm recurrence was adjudicated by the site as disease related, study device, and study procedure related.Target aneurysm retreatment was adjudicated by the site to be study disease related.During operative procedure to treat the aneurysm recurrence, an intra-operative aneurysm rupture occurred; the aneurysm characteristics contributed to the rupture that led to the patient death was adjudicated by the site to be disease related.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LVIS
Common Device Name
STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION, INC.
35 enterprise
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
terrence callahan
35 enterprise
aliso viejo, CA 92656
7142478000
MDR Report Key21955876
Report Number2032493-2025-90129
Device Sequence Number7151743
Product Code QCA
UDI-Device Identifier00842429100974
UDI-Public(01)00842429100974(11)180718(17)210630(10)180718558
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateND
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P170013
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2019
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Study,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/09/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2021
Device Model Number214035-LVIS-D-PMA
Device Lot Number180718558
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/09/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/12/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/04/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/09/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured07/18/2018
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-