|
An investigation was conducted: it was reported by the customer that during an atec sapphire 100 procedure on (b)(6), 2025, there was not enough suction, and they took several samples but did not get enough to complete the procedure.Patient impact was reported as there was a tissue acquisition issue and the procedure was unable to be completed.The system was replaced via advanced exchange.Initial evaluation: the atec system had been in use for approximately 13 months at the time of the complaint.Investigation methods and findings: the atec system was not returned to hologic¿s post market quality assurance (pmqa) team for investigation, but was instead sent to hologic¿s marlborough, ma location to be serviced by a hologic manufacturing technician as part of a system refurbishment process.Based on the report completed by the technician, no issues were found with the return unit.Cause/root cause: no further investigation could be completed into this issue since the issue was not confirmed.Due to the lack of information, the only probable root cause that can be determined is an issue with the vacuum line that was not reproducible.Conclusion: it was reported by the customer that during an atec sapphire 100 procedure on april 7, 2025, there was not enough suction and required taking several samples and not enough.Patient impact was reported as there was a tissue acquisition issue and the details of the complaint indicated that they did not receive enough samples to complete the procedure.The atec system was not returned to hologic¿s post market quality assurance (pmqa) team for investigation, but was instead sent to hologic¿s marlborough, ma location to be serviced by a hologic manufacturing technician as part of a system refurbishment process.Based on the report completed by the technician, no issues were found with the return unit.The calculated occurrence is ¿acceptable¿ risk zone.Future events will be monitored and trended for this issue.Complaint confirmed: no
device history record (dhr) review:
system serial number: (b)(4).System sku: rm-atec sapphire 100
system manufacture date: (b)(6) 2022
system installation date: (b)(6) 2025
udi: (b)(4)
the device history record for the serial number involved was reviewed and was found to have met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment for distribution.This includes final inspection and packaging inspections.No deviations are mentioned within the dhr.Performed a complaint review for the atec system.There were 0 prior complaints related to a vacuum/issue within 12 months prior to the complaint listed against the system.
|