| Catalog Number |
121932150 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
12/16/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the pinnacle liner was damaged in situ, and the patient needed revision as a result.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # = >(b)(4).Investigation summary = > no device associated with this report was received for examination.A search of the j&j medtech orthopaedics nonconformance (nc) quality system found no nc¿s associated with this product 121932150/lot m28m33combination.As part of our company quality system process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and distributed to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending as part of the post-market surveillance.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device history lot = > a search of the j&j medtech orthopaedics nonconformance (nc) quality system found no nc¿s associated with this product 121932150/lot m28m33combination.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H11 additional narrative: added: d9, d10 (concomitant) if information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: possible product failure, pinnacle liner damaged in situ and needing revision.Surgeon would like an analysis of the product to determine mode of failure.The product was returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics for evaluation.Visual inspection of the returned device did found that the pinn mar +4 10d 32idx50od has three of six anti-rotation device (ard) tabs sheared off and they were not returned for evaluation.Additionally, the liner appeared to have been edge loaded causing eccentric deformation in the rim of the device and ultimately contributing to the failure of the anti-rotation devices (ards).There are machining lines from the manufacturing process yet visible within the liner which would not be as obviously present if would be more centrally loaded.Due to the observed condition of the involved implants it is reasonable to conclude that a disassociation event occurred between the liner and the cup.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused or contributed to the reported event.Although the liner failure cannot be traced to design or manufacturing, a definite root cause cannot be established due to there being multiple factors that may influence.Consideration must be given to all potential influences such as surgical process, patient variables (e.G.Activity level and use), anatomical considerations and patient changes over time.Any conclusions from the investigational input provided have to be placed into context with all other relevant factors.It is highly recommended to the patient to consult with their healthcare professional for further assessment.A functional test was not performed since it was not applicable to the complaint condition.A dimensional inspection was not performed since it was not applicable to the complaint condition.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the pinn mar +4 10d 32idx50od would have contributed to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device m28m33 number, and no non-conformances were identified during manufacturing.H11 additional narrative: corrected: h3.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|