|
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC NGEN GENERATOR; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS, CARDIAC ABLATION, FOR TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
D138402 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Fistula (1862)
|
| Date of Event |
04/08/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The hardware investigation has begun but it has not been completed at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by biosense webster inc., or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, biosense webster inc., or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Note: per fda request, mdr submissions for the ngen rf generator are to be reported with pma details of the catheter used along with the ngen rf generator.If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.Manufacturer's ref: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that after an atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter ablation procedure with a qdot micro and an ngen generator and the patient experienced an esophageal fistula that required "medical intervention".After a right-sided atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation procedure was completed on (b)(6) 2025, an esophageal fistula was noticed in the patient on (b)(6) 2025.When the patient went back to a different hospital on (b)(6) for a check-up, it was noticed that the patient had some "esophageal damage." it is unknown how the esophageal damage was discovered.It was reported that an esophageal fistula was confirmed in the patient, but it is unknown how it was confirmed.Medical intervention was provided to the patient, but the specific type of intervention is unknown.The patient was reported to be in stable condition.It was confirmed there was "esophageal cooling" utilized during the procedure on (b)(6).It was noted that they noticed damaged on patient interface unit (piu) map pins.Additional information was received which indicated the physician¿s opinion on the cause of this adverse event was that wide antral circumferential ablation (waca) ran behind the esophagus (right sided esophagus).The patient required extended hospitalization because initially the patient was sent home after the procedure and went to another hospital for treatment of esophageal fistula days later.The ngen generator was used in q mode at 40 watts and 30 seconds.No error messages were observed on biosense webster equipment during the procedure and modalities used to prevent esophageal injury was cooling probe and confirmation of its location only.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
It was reported that after an atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter ablation procedure with a qdot micro and an ngen generator and the patient experienced an esophageal fistula that required "medical intervention".After a right-sided atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation procedure was completed on (b)(6) 2025, an esophageal fistula was noticed in the patient on (b)(6) 2025.When the patient went back to a different hospital on (b)(6) for a check-up, it was noticed that the patient had some "esophageal damage." it is unknown how the esophageal damage was discovered.It was reported that an esophageal fistula was confirmed in the patient, but it is unknown how it was confirmed.Medical intervention was provided to the patient, but the specific type of intervention is unknown.The patient was reported to be in stable condition.Device evaluation details: technical services performed a remote evaluation of the device.The service was declined by the customer.The system is fully operational.No further investigation on this device was performed.A device history record evaluation was performed for the finished device number, and no internal actions related to the reported condition were identified.As part of the quality process, the devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.Manufacturer's ref.# (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|