|
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD FEMORAL HEAD 48MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
74123148 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Biocompatibility (2886)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Erosion (1750); Cyst(s) (1800); Pain (1994); Metal Related Pathology (4530)
|
| Date of Event |
12/27/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).This complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a reported patient complication that includes reference to the use of a smith+nephew product without evidence of a specific product problem.The reported complication relates to known inherent procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to confirm a relationship between the reported event and the device or identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are conservatively submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, after the patient underwent a right hip metal-on-metal bhr tha performed on (b)(6) 2009, a right revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2023 due to pain and weakness, and a conversion to tha was performed.The patient also had elevated chromium and cobalt levels.A moderately severe synovitis with extensive posterior lateral debris were noticed, consistent with probable pseudocysts in the lateral and posterior lateral aspect of the acetabulum, with some erosive changes noted.Acetabular component remain solid in terms of fixation.There was no gross evidence of infection.The femoral head was removed and replaced for medacta size 3 amis p femoral component with 48 mm o.D./ 28 mm i.D.Dual mobility liner and a 28 mm s (-3.5 mm) delta ceramic femoral head.The acetabular component was retained.The current health status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H6: health effect - clinical code.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.Without a definitive batch number, a complete review of the historical complaints data cannot be performed for the alleged devices.A review of historical complaints data was performed using the part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.Similar complaints have been identified for the head.Similar complaints have been identified for the cup.This failure will continue to be monitored via routine trending.As no device batch numbers were provided for investigation, manufacturing record review could not be performed.If more information is received, this investigation will be reopened.The review of the most recent ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, no prior applicable escalation actions were identified.The available medical documents were reviewed.A clinical root cause could not be determined.The pain, weakness, erosion and synovitis are consistent with the reported pseudocysts.However, a clinical root cause for the reported event cannot be definitively confirmed.The patient impact beyond the reported revision could not be determined.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, excessive patient weight, trauma to the joint replacement, loosening of components may increase production of wear particles and accelerate damage to the bone.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|