| Catalog Number |
335775 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Calibration Problem (2890)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
04/10/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
G.5.Pma / 510(k)#: k040725.G.5.Pma / 510(k)#: k050191.G.5.Pma / 510(k)#: k062087.G.5.Pma / 510(k)#: k141468.H.3.A device evaluation and/or device history review is anticipated but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that while using bd facs¿ 7-color setup beads 25 tests contamination was observed.There was no report of user impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "failing lot"."1.Were patient samples contaminated or was there carryover (cross-contamination/mixing) between patient samples? if no, no further questions required.Patient samples contaminated, carryover between patient samples, unknown - go to question #2.Yes.2.Please describe any additional details: go to patient samples checklist.Patient samples checklist: 1.Did this cause erroneous results on patient samples for diagnostic testing? if yes, go to question #2.Yes.If no, no further questions required.2.Was an erroneous laboratory result from the bdb product reported to a clinician? if yes, go to question #3.No.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that while using bd facs¿ 7-color setup beads 25 tests contamination was observed.There was no report of user impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "failing lot" "1.Were patient samples contaminated or was there carryover (cross-contamination/mixing) between patient samples? if no, no further questions required.Patient samples contaminated, carryover between patient samples, unknown - go to question #2.Yes 2.Please describe any additional details: go to patient samples checklist.Patient samples checklist: 1.Did this cause erroneous results on patient samples for diagnostic testing? if yes, go to question #2.Yes, if no, no further questions required.2.Was an erroneous laboratory result from the bdb product reported to a clinician? if yes, go to question #3.No.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
After further evaluation of the complaint, it has been determined that the previously submitted report was sent in error.New information obtained confirms that no contamination/carryover occurred, therefore, this is not considered to be a reportable malfunction.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|