• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. TWINFIX TI 5.0 ULTRABRAID; STAPLE, FIXATION, BONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. TWINFIX TI 5.0 ULTRABRAID; STAPLE, FIXATION, BONE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 72200755
Medical Device Problem Codes Material Fragmentation (1261); Failure to Advance (2524)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/13/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H6: the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual evaluation showed the device was returned in original packaging with the batch number of the complaint on the label.The sutures are still on the device, run through the cannula, and tied at the cleat.The anchor has been fragmented, and two small pieces of it are inside the cannula of the insertion device.The rest of the anchor was not returned.Bio debris is present.Based on the condition of the product material found during visual inspection, additional material testing is not required.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the anchor material specification found that no burrs, cracks, or contamination is allowed.A certification of compliance to material and processing specifications is required.The root cause has been associated with unintended use of the device factors that could have contributed to the failure include excessive force used on the device.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a shoulder arthroscopy, when the first twinfix anchor was inserted, the meama progressed halfway through the tunnel, causing the anchor to be sprayed with the wrench.The anchor was removed from the patient.The procedure was completed without surgical delay using a back-up device.No further complications were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TWINFIX TI 5.0 ULTRABRAID
Common Device Name
STAPLE, FIXATION, BONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
1450 brooks rd.
memphis, TN 38116
5123913905
MDR Report Key22023597
Report Number1219602-2025-01125
Device Sequence Number9164156
Product Code JDR
UDI-Device Identifier03596010577986
UDI-Public3596010577986
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryBR
PMA/510(K) Number
K152566
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 05/14/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number72200755
Device Lot Number2153125
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/04/2025
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/22/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/14/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/14/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age46 YR
Patient SexUnknown
-
-