|
Zimvie complaint number (b)(4).The following fields have been updated: b4: date of this report.B5: describe event or problem.G3: date received by manufacturer.G6: type of report.H1: type of reportable event.H2: follow up type.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer.H6: adverse event problem.H10: additional narrative.Zimvie received one (1) bost3210, (3i t3 non-platform switched tapered implant 3.25 x 10mm) for evaluation.Visual evaluation was performed, the implant had signs of use with bone debris on its internal and external threads.The implant had a crown attached the implant was fractured at the body.The fractured piece was returned.Device history record (dhr) review was completed for the subject lot number 2023020102.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number 2023020102 for similar events and no other complaint was identified.Review completed utilizing keywords: dental : functional : fracture : implant the customer did submit images for the reported event.The image was of two implants, however unable to detect the fractured implant.Based on the investigation and risk management file review, the most likely root cause determined from the investigation was patient factors.Therefore, based on the available information, a device malfunction did occur.The implant was fractured at the body.The fractured piece was returned.The reported event was confirmed.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the products were nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.At this time, the complaint investigation has been completed and the record will be closed.If additional information is received, the record will be re-opened for further evaluation.
|