|
Product complaint # = > (b)(4).This is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.H6 component code: g07002 device not returned attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Please provide the patient's demographic information including age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure.The diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? what was the initial approach for the index surgical procedure? (open, laparoscopic or other)? on what tissue was the suture used? what was the tissue condition (normal, thin, calcified, fragile, diseased)? how was the suture placed (interrupted or continuous)? how was the suture tied (square knot or multiple knots one end)? what tissue dehisced? please describe the appearance of the suture during the second procedure.Did the suture break? if so, where was the break noted (termination, middle, end)? did the suture untie, break, or pull out of the tissue? please specify.Were there any patient stress factors that led to the suture untying, breaking or pulling out of the tissue? onset date/time of dehiscence? (# post op days) please describe any surgical intervention required for the wound dehiscence including date and findings.Did the operating surgeon observe any suture deficiency or anomaly before, during, after the suture placement or during any re-operation? what symptoms did the patient experience following the index surgical procedure? onset date? other relevant patient history/concomitant medications? what is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? what is the patient's current status? *** our failure analysis lab received the additional product with reference to this complaint, the following additional product was received: - (2) vcp726d; lot# 104bbz; (1) vcp726d; lot# 10192g this complaint is for product code vcp864d; lot# 105rmk and vcp726d; lot# 104bqp 1.Please clarify if the additional device with lot # 104bbz and lot# 10192g belong to this complaint? 1a.If yes, did a device malfunction occur during the same procedure? 2.If not, please clarify if the additional received product belongs to a different complaint? if so, can you please provide the complaint number.3.If the device was not reported before, please provide more details of device malfunction.4.If the product doesn¿t belong to any complaint, please let us know so we can discard it or advise if the product is required to be returned.
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no related non-conformances were identified.H6 component code: g07002 no device problem.Additional h3 investigation summary: the product was returned to ethicon for evaluation.Four unopened foil packets were received for analysis.The product code vcp864d is multi-strands and contains eight strands per packet.In order to evaluate the condition of the returned samples, the packets were opened, and the swage and attachment area was noted to be as expected.The sutures were dispensed without problems and examined along the strand and no issues related to breakage sutures or anomalies were observed during the evaluation.A functional test was performed using instron equipment and the tensile force was above the minimum requirements.As part of ethicon quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The event described could not be confirmed as the device performed without any difficulties noted.Although no product defect was identified, there may have been other circumstances or issues that occurred during the use of the device that could not be replicated during the laboratory analysis.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: our failure analysis lab received the additional product with reference to this complaint; the following additional product was received: - (2) vcp726d; lot# 104bbz; (1) vcp726d; lot# 10192g this complaint is for product code vcp864d; lot# 105rmk and vcp726d; lot# 104bqp - please clarify if the additional device with lot # 104bbz and lot# 10192g belong to this complaint? the patient came back and the complaint was filed a month after the procedure.The account submitted several packs of suture from the same lots that were used on the patient.The surgeon said that the patient dehisced but did not report any suture that was left in the patient.The surgeon does not believe that the plus suture has the same strength as the non-plus suture and wanted to test the strength of the plus suture.
|