• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 04/21/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a2, a3a, a3b, a4, a5, a6, patient information: unknown/not provided.Section d6b, if explanted, give date: not applicable.There is no indication the lens was explanted.Section h3, device evaluated by manufacturer: the device has not been returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain the missing information.However, to date, it has not been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the haptics of the preloaded johnson and johnson (jnj) intraocular lens (iol) were stuck together inside the eye.The doctor had to manually separate them.There were no further complications, and he was able to successfully complete the procedure.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: june 12, 2025.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: the complaint handpiece was received.Visual inspection under magnification reveal the complaint handpiece was received with the plunger rod partially advanced.Viscoelastic residue was observed to be evenly distributed throughout the cartridge; the cartridge tip was observed to be torn.The lens module and device assembly was inspected revealing no issues.The plunger rod and plunger rod advancement was inspected revealing no issues.The lens was not received for evaluation.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key22040978
Report Number3012236936-2025-000142
Device Sequence Number15673568
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731868
UDI-Public(01)05050474731868(17)280109
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateIL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/25/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0250
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/06/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/20/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/17/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/26/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/09/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-