• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CONSOLIDATED MEDICAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY ANCHOR TISSUE RETRIEVAL SYSTEM; LAPAROSCOPE, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CONSOLIDATED MEDICAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY ANCHOR TISSUE RETRIEVAL SYSTEM; LAPAROSCOPE, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number TRS-ROBO-8
Medical Device Problem Code Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 05/02/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Update: the classification of the mdr has been updated from malfunction to injury with findings from medwatch report mw5170291.Neither the device nor photographic evidence was provided.Therefore, the reported event can not be verified.The manufacturing documents from the device history record have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of the product.The product released for distribution was found to have met all specifications prior to shipment.This is the only complaint for this lot number and failure mode within the past two years.A two-year review of complaint history revealed there has been a total of 64 reports, regarding (b)(4) devices, for this device family and failure mode.During this same time frame (b)(4) devices have been manufactured and shipped worldwide.Should all the complaint devices have been found confirmed for this reported failure, the rate of failure would be (b)(4).Per the instructions for use, the user is advised the following: only physicians trained in the techniques of laparoscopic or minimally invasive surgery and the use of retrieval bags to remove tissue should use the product.Do not use the anchor¿ tissue retrieval system¿ if resistance is met upon deployment.Improper use of the anchor¿ tissue retrieval system¿ may result in perforation of tissue and subsequent bleeding.Care should be taken when using sharp and electro-surgical devices.Note the size of the trocar cannula when removing a specimen through the trocar cannula and seal system.If required, enlarge the port site to aid removal of the anchor¿ tissue retrieval system¿ by conmed.We will continue to monitor per regulatory requirements to help ensure patient safety.
 
Event or Problem Description
Update: per medwatch mw5170291 received on (b)(6) 2025 "during surgical procedure, bag from tissue retrieval system ruptured while in the patient's abdomen spilling the contents.The surgical incision was extended to visually locate the specimen and remove it from the abdomen prior to surgical closure." codes 4559: unspecified tissue injury and 1546: material rupture were reported.The incident type has been changed from malfunction to serious injury due to medwatch findings.This report is being raised due to the reported injury of extension of the incision to locate the specimen.The sales representative reported on behalf of the customer that the trs-robo-8, anchor tissue retrieval system was being used on (b)(6) 2025 during a robotic prostatectomy and the ¿specimen bag ripped at seam while removing specimen.When removing specimen, bag ripped at the seam.The specimen was lost in the cavity taking longer than expected to find the prostate.Patient had to be under anesthesia for 30-45 minutes longer than expected." there was no impact or injury to the patient or user.The procedure was completed.This report is being raised due to the reported malfunction with potential for injury upon reoccurrence.
 
Event or Problem Description
The sales representative reported on behalf of the customer that the was being used on (b)(6) 2025 during a robotic prostatectomy and the ¿specimen bag ripped at seam while removing specimen.When removing specimen, bag ripped at the seam.The specimen was lost in the cavity taking longer than expected to find the prostate.Patient had to be under anesthesia for 30-45 minutes longer than expected." there was no impact or injury to the patient or user.The procedure was completed.This report is being raised due to the reported malfunction with potential for injury upon reoccurrence.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Neither the device nor photographic evidence was provided.Therefore, the reported event can not be verified.The manufacturing documents from the device history record have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of the product.The product released for distribution was found to have met all specifications prior to shipment.This is the only complaint for this lot number and failure mode within the past two years.A two-year review of complaint history revealed there has been a total of 64 reports, regarding 72 devices, for this device family and failure mode.During this same time frame (b)(4) devices have been manufactured and shipped worldwide.Should all the complaint devices have been found confirmed for this reported failure, the rate of failure would be (b)(4).Per the instructions for use, the user is advised the following: only physicians trained in the techniques of laparoscopic or minimally invasive surgery and the use of retrieval bags to remove tissue should use the product.Do not use the anchor¿ tissue retrieval system¿ if resistance is met upon deployment.Improper use of the anchor¿ tissue retrieval system¿ may result in perforation of tissue and subsequent bleeding.Care should be taken when using sharp and electro-surgical devices.Note the size of the trocar cannula when removing a specimen through the trocar cannula and seal system.If required, enlarge the port site to aid removal of the anchor¿ tissue retrieval system¿ by conmed.We will continue to monitor per regulatory requirements to help ensure patient safety.
 
Event or Problem Description
The sales representative reported on behalf of the customer that the trs-robo-8, anchor tissue retrieval system was being used on (b)(6) 2025 during a robotic prostatectomy and the ¿specimen bag ripped at seam while removing specimen.When removing specimen, bag ripped at the seam.The specimen was lost in the cavity taking longer than expected to find the prostate.Patient had to be under anesthesia for 30-45 minutes longer than expected." there was no impact or injury to the patient or user.The procedure was completed.This report is being raised due to the reported malfunction with potential for injury upon reoccurrence.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device is not expected to be returned for evaluation and review.However, the complaint investigation is not complete at this time.A supplemental and final report will be filed following the completion of the complaint investigation.We will continue to monitor per regulatory requirements to help ensure patient safety.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ANCHOR TISSUE RETRIEVAL SYSTEM
Common Device Name
LAPAROSCOPE, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY
Manufacturer (Section D)
CONSOLIDATED MEDICAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY
ave. alejandro dumas 11321
complejo industrial chihuahua
chihuahua 31136
MX  31136
Manufacturer (Section G)
CONSOLIDATED MEDICAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY
ave. alejandro dumas 11321
complejo industrial chihuahua
chihuahua 31136
MX   31136
Manufacturer Contact
robin drum
11311 concept blvd
largo, FL 33773
8653881978
MDR Report Key22042850
Report Number3007305485-2025-00088
Device Sequence Number18367354
Product Code GCJ
UDI-Device Identifier20653405986147
UDI-Public(01)20653405986147(17)280220(10)202502204
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOH
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K172940
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/06/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberTRS-ROBO-8
Device Lot Number202502204
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/02/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/22/2025
06/06/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/19/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/02/2025
06/06/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/20/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Other;
Patient Age69 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight67 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
-
-