|
A physician reported that during cataract surgery, an ophthalmic suture was found to be broken, and it lacked toughness.The procedure was completed on the same day, and patient harm has not been reported.
|
|
Additional information provided in sections d.9., h.3., h.6., and h.11.A review of the device history record traceable to the reported lot number, indicates that the reported product was processed and released according to the reported product¿s acceptance criteria.The investigation conducted a non-conformance review of the reported lot number.No deviations were identified, and all corresponding production release specifications defined in the device master record were met.Two opened sutures, in pouches, in blisters were received for the report of suture lacks toughness and broke.Samples were visually inspected and found to be conforming.A dimensional inspection was done for suture diameter, and samples were found to be conforming.Functional testing for suture strength was performed, and both sutures were found to be conforming.Based on the evaluation of the information and materials received, the investigation concluded that the root cause of the reported event is not determined as the returned sample was conforming for all visual, dimensional, and functional testing.No further investigative or manufacturing actions are warranted at this time due to that the returned sample met specifications.Receipt of additional relevant information or supporting materials will prompt a re-evaluation of the complaint investigation.Complaint data for all manufacturer products is reviewed monthly to monitor for adverse trends.During the last review, no adverse trends were observed for the reported product and event combination.Quality assurance has reviewed this complaint and will continue to monitor data for evidence of adverse trending and take further action, as appropriate.No further action warranted at this time.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|