|
This is 1 of 2 reports (1st mdr).Section d4: lot#, expiration date and gtin: updated.Section d9: product returned to stryker and returned to manufacturer on: updated.Section e1: initial reporter name, initial reporter first name and initial reporter last name: updated.Section e2: health professional and health professional occupation: updated.Section g2: initial reporter type: updated.Section h3: device evaluated by mfg: updated.Section h4: manufacturing date: updated.There are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.During visual inspection it was observed that the guidewire was returned jammed inside the broken microcatheter.The devices were soaked but could not be removed.The guidewire was seen to be broken in numerous locations along the nitinol tubing starting from 207cm with the core wire exposed, the distal end was returned separate at 10 cm.The core wire was observed through the distal tip dome.The functional inspection was not required.The reported event is covered in the device direction for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.The reported event 'guidewire broken/fractured during use' was confirmed based on the analysis of the returned device.The reported event 'guidewire difficult engaging target vessel' is not a product related code.Therefore, could not be replicated during analysis, however the analysis results are consistent with the reported event.The device failed to meet specifications when received for complaint investigation based on the analyzed anomalies noted to the device.It was reported that the subject guidewire and a microcatheter were removed from the patient and were broken.A strongly elongated internal carotid with multiple hairpin bends made it difficult to reach the occlusion.We then removed the microcatheter with guidewire from the patient.A microcatheter that is in several pieces.(the guide wire was completely curled but it was still connected, only pulled apart outside the patient (with little force)).Additional information provided by the customer indicated that the patient's anatomy was quite tortuous.There was no resistance encountered while removing the guidewire from the dispenser hoop.Continuous flush was maintained throughout the procedure.The guidewire was returned jammed within the damaged microcatheter, the guidewire along with the microcatheter was noted to be fractured in numerous locations.It was reported that the internal carotid had multiple hairpin bends which made it difficult to reach the occlusion, it is probable that the microcatheter and the subject guidewire were damaged during the attempt to advance to the target occlusion and was further damaged during the attempt to remove the devices from the patient.The extent of the damage noted to the returned devices is indicative of extreme force to the devices.An assignable cause of procedural factors will be assigned to the reported event device difficulty engaging target vessel and guidewire broken/fractured during use and to the analyzed event guidewire broken/fractured during use and guidewire jammed, as the issue is associated with a product that meets company's design and manufacture specifications and was used in according with the dfu but due to procedural and/or anatomical factors during use, the product performance was limited.
|