|
|
| Catalog Number |
ECP0110GV |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Difficult to Remove (1528); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
04/24/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: the manufacturing location was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The manufacturing location for the encor product is adroit medical equipment.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2025, a patient underwent an electron-triggered x-ray imaging breast tissue marker placement procedure through grease density tissue using senomark ultra and encor probe.During the procedure, the marker was allegedly difficult to insert into the probe.It was further reported that the marker failed to deploy.After washing and placing the marker on the needle, the marker did not come out of the guide, remaining halfway open, which made it difficult to remove the needle from the breast.Reportedly needle was removed with the help of an emergency surgeon, by making a larger incision.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed, and this lot met all release criteria.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failures as no objective evidence was provided for review.A definitive root cause for the alleged device-device incompatibility and difficult to remove could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.D4 (unique identifier (udi) #), g3, h6 (patient, method).Section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2025, a patient underwent an electron-triggered x-ray imaging breast tissue marker placement procedure through grease density tissue using senomark ultra and encor probe.During the procedure, the marker was allegedly difficult to insert into the probe.It was further reported that the marker failed to deploy.After washing and placing the marker on the needle, the marker did not come out of the guide, remaining halfway open, which made it difficult to remove the needle from the breast.Reportedly, the needle was removed with the help of an emergency surgeon, by making a larger incision.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|