|
It was reported, prior to patient contact during a retrograde intrarenal surgery (rirs) in the left kidney, the user tested the ncircle delta wire tipless stone extractor and found the basket could not be opened to 30fr diameter wide, it would only open to around 18 fr visually.The operation was completed by using another same type device.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unchanged, unknown or unavailable.Investigation ¿ evaluation, it was reported, prior to patient contact during a retrograde intrarenal surgery (rirs) in the left kidney, the user tested the ncircle delta wire tipless stone extractor and found the basket could not be opened to 30fr diameter wide, it would only open to around 18 fr visually.The operation was completed by using another same type device.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Reviews of documentation including the complaint history, device history record (dhr), quality control procedures, manufacturing instructions (mi), and instructions for use (ifu), as well as a visual inspection and functional test, of the returned device, were conducted during the investigation.A device failure analysis was conducted on the returned device.Device was returned in an open package with label.Handle was actuated, and the basket would move but not open/close fully.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the dhrs for the reported complaint device lot revealed no recorded non-conformances relevant to the failure mode.A complaint history search identified no other events reported for the related failure mode.Based on the available information, cook has concluded that the device was manufactured to specification and that there is no evidence suggesting nonconforming product exists either in house or in the field.Cook also reviewed product labeling.The ifu packaged with the device does not contain information relevant to the reported event.Based on the information provided, inspection of the returned device, and the results of the investigation, a cause for the issue could not be established.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute toa death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|