• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INBONE TALAR DOME SZ 3 SULCUS; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INBONE TALAR DOME SZ 3 SULCUS; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 220220903
Medical Device Problem Codes Osseointegration Problem (3003); Implant subsidence (4078)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
Date of Event 04/30/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device is not available for evaluation as it remains implanted in the patient therefore an evaluation of the device cannot be performed.If additional information becomes available, it will be provided on a supplemental report.
 
Event or Problem Description
The digital stryker prophecy team received a ct scan indicating that the patient may require a revision surgery due to subsidence of the talar implant.
 
Event or Problem Description
The digital stryker prophecy team received a ct scan indicating that the patient may require a revision surgery due to subsidence of the talar implant.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Correction to h6(results code).The complaint couldn't be confirmed, since the returned image for evaluation don't matches the alleged failure.Upon further investigation of the ct scans by healthcare professionals the following was observed: the ct scan does not show any abnormalities regarding the tibial component.There is a subsidence described for the talar component.Adjacent to the talar component there is almost no radiolucence, and no large cysts, the device, however, seems to be subsided medially a little more, than laterally.Without the comparison to initial radiographs or ct scan after the implantation, this is difficult to assess.The underlying cause of the subsidence is unclear; it could be related to poor bone substance and thus a patient related factor.However, failure of total ankle replacement tar over time is a known complication.In case of a planned revision procedure a medical opinion aiming to determine the root cause of the failure is part of the internal investigation process.Sufficient radiological and clinical information must be provided to enable a meaningful clinical assessment and to identify possible causes of failure.In cases where a ct scan is the only available clinical source, this assessment is limited.No conclusive statement can be provided, because key clinical information e.G., clinical status, exact symptoms, and range of motion of the patient, assessment of the treating physician is missing.The root causes of radiographic findings such as radiolucent areas and bone cysts are often complex and multifactorial and cannot be determined scientifically without this decisive evidence.Due to these limitations, we are unable in such cases to provide statements about the patient, the procedure and or the device in relation to cause of the failure.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.More detailed information about the complaint event must be available in order to determine the root cause of the complaint event.If the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INBONE TALAR DOME SZ 3 SULCUS
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC
1023 cherry rd
memphis TN 38117
Manufacturer (Section G)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
11576 memphis arlington rd
arlington TN 38002
Manufacturer Contact
cécile lefeuvre
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key22091850
Report Number3010667733-2025-00659
Device Sequence Number6926244
Product Code HSN
UDI-Device Identifier00840420124227
UDI-Public(01)00840420124227(11)200415(17)280413(10)1670794
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K100886
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/26/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue Number220220903
Device Lot Number1670794
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/30/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/04/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/27/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/26/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured04/15/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient Age54 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-