|
The reference: (b)(4) has been allocated to this case by rayner.The event description provided states that immediately following implantation into the eye, a large scratch was observed in the visual axis.The lens was explanted and exchanged during the original surgery session without further incident and without harm or injury to the patient."iol replacement or extraction" is listed in the "adverse events" section of the rayone ifu.The device has not been returned to rayner.The rayner hydrophilic acrylic iol use risk analysis identifies the following as possible causes of "physical damage to lens"; sharp edge instruments used during surgical procedure, surgical procedure: incorrect use of lens injection system, surgeon misidentifying posterior capsule creasing, lens surface ablated by nd: yag operator error and cracked optic surface post injection due to dehydration of lens.Additionally, the rayone preloaded iol injection system use risk analysis identifies forcing a blocked injector, inadequate lubrication, misuse of device and optic edge trapped/damaged on closure of cartridge as possible causes of lens optic damage.Our review of production records for the rayone aspheric rao600c batch: 064245690 showed that all manufacturing and quality checks were conducted with successful results.All devices released for distribution from this batch were within tolerance, met specification criteria and were without defects.There is insufficient evidence and information available to determine the cause of the scratched lens.
|
|
On 13th may 2025, rayner received notification from a us healthcare professional of an event that occurred during use of a rayone galaxy rao605g.The event description provided states that immediately following implantation, a large scratch was observed in the visual axis necessitating lens explantation and exchange.Note: rayone galaxy study subject: (b)(6).
|