• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC CXI SUPPORT CATHETER; KRA CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC CXI SUPPORT CATHETER; KRA CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH Back to Search Results
Model Number G52542
Medical Device Problem Code Material Perforation (2205)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 05/09/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3 = device evaluation anticipated, but not yet begun.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, during an unspecified procedure, another manufacturer's wire guide went through a cxi support catheter.The patient's anatomy was calcified, tortuous and stenosed.Both a stiff and standard wire guide were used during the procedure.While trying to cross the occlusion, the cxi was advanced ahead of the wire and kinked.The wire also went through the side of the catheter.The complaint device was removed and replaced with a new catheter.It is unknown if resistance was felt during insertion and/or advancement of the catheter, however, there was difficulty advancing unspecified sheath up and over the bifurcation due to the tortuosity.There was no harm to the patient.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures or experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Summary of event: as reported, during an unspecified procedure, another manufacturer's wire guide went through a cxi support catheter.The patient's anatomy was calcified, tortuous and stenosed.Both a stiff and standard wire guide were used during the procedure.While trying to cross the occlusion, the cxi was advanced ahead of the wire and kinked.The wire also went through the side of the catheter.The complaint device was removed and replaced with a new catheter.It is unknown if resistance was felt during insertion and/or advancement of the catheter, however, there was difficulty advancing unspecified sheath up and over the bifurcation due to the tortuosity.There was no harm to the patient.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures or experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), instructions for use (ifu), and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned to cook for investigation.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device history record found no relevant non-conformances on the final or sub-assembly lots.A review of complaint history found no additional complaints for the final or sub-assembly lots.The product ifu cautions ¿the catheter should not be advanced through and area of resistance unless the source of the resistance is identified by fluoroscopy and appropriate steps are taken to reduce or remove the obstruction.¿ a review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The information provided upon review of the dmr, dhr, and ifu suggests that there is evidence the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of non-conforming devices in-house or in the field.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that the patient¿s anatomy contributed to this event.It is likely that the anatomy caused the catheter to kink, and as the wire was advanced through the kink, it came out the side of the catheter.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed, and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CXI SUPPORT CATHETER
Common Device Name
KRA CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key22095443
Report Number1820334-2025-00602
Device Sequence Number6736022
Product Code KRA
UDI-Device Identifier00827002525429
UDI-Public(01)00827002525429(17)280218(10)16469500
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K160884
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/13/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberG52542
Device Catalogue NumberCXI-4.0-35-135-P-NS-0
Device Lot Number16469500
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/09/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/29/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/28/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/13/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured02/18/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
.035 TERUMO ANGLED GLIDEWIRE STIFF/STANDARD
Patient SexUnknown
-
-