MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN LLC PALINDROME; CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, IMPLANTED, COATED

Model Number	8888145044CP
Medical Device Problem Code	Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code	No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Type of Reportable Event	Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
Event or Problem Description
According to the reporter, during the treatment, the venous (blue) luer adapter and the hub were found to be broken, with visible cracks and leakage.The customer was using the competitor¿s extension lines with the device.The customer was also using the white competitor¿s caps.There was nothing unusual observed on the device prior to use.There was no excessive force used on the device.Other products were being utilized with the device.Flushing was done prior to use, and the result was unremarkable.The catheter was not repaired.An instrument was used to loosen or tighten the device.The tego was not utilized.Octenisept was the cleaning agent used on the device.Octenisept was typically utilized to clean the catheter in its entirety.The cleaning agent was allowed to dry thoroughly prior to applying the ointment to the area.The cleaning agent was allowed to dry thoroughly prior to dressing the area.Cleaning agent was not mixed.The wound dressing does not include any cleaning agents or antimicrobial properties.The patient themselves did not use any type of cleaning agent or antibiotic on the catheters.The cleaning agent was not switched over the life of the catheter.There has been no recent change in the protocol for cleaning agents.The site did not use sepsiderm to clean the catheters.Patients did not apply any cleaning agents or antibiotics to the catheters themselves.The patient was not treated under general orlocal anesthesia.Besides the reported issue, there was a visible tear found on the product at the time of the event.As a remedial action, the arterial leg was used.The procedure was completed after the remedial action.There was no intervention/treatment required as a result of the event.There was no blood loss, and blood transfusion was not required.The catheter was in place for four months.There was no reported patient injury.
Event or Problem Description
According to the reporter, during the treatment, the venous (blue) luer adapter was found to be broken, with visible cracks and leakage.The catheter was not repaired.The tego was not utilized.The patient was not treated under general or local anesthesia.There was nothing unusual observed on the device prior to use.Flushing was done prior to use, and the result was unremarkable.Other products being utilized with the device included circuits and extensions.The customer was using a competitor's extension lines with the catheter and a competitor's caps.There was no excessive force used on the device.The cleaning agent used on the device was octenisept, which was also typically utilized to clean the catheter in its entirety.The device was loosened/tightened manually by hand.Lavanide was in demand for ointment, which was utilized at the exit site.The wound dressing does not include any cleaning agents or antimicrobial properties.The cleaning agents are allowed to dry completely before ointment application.The cleaning agents were allowed to dry thoroughly before the area was dressed.The patients are not responsible for catheter maintenance, cleaning, or dressing changes.The cleaning agents were never switched over the life of the catheter and were never mixed.Sepsiderm was not used for cleaning catheters.There was no protocol change for cleaning agents used recently.The patient themselves was not using any type of cleaning agent or antibiotic on the catheters.The insertion site was treated prior to product placement.Besides the reported issue, there was a visible tear found on the product at the time of the event.As a remedial action and intervention, the arterial leg was used, and explantation was performed.The existing shunt could be punctured for further treatment, eliminating the need to implant a new catheter.There was no blood loss, and blood transfusion was not required.The catheter was in place for 4 months.There was no reported patient injury.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: g3 correction: b5 medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: d9, g3, h3.Correction: b5.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
Event or Problem Description
According to the reporter, during the treatment, the venous (blue) luer adapter and the hub were found to be broken, with visible cracks and leakage.The catheter was not repaired.The tego was not utilized.The patient was not treated under general or local anesthesia.There was nothing unusual observed on the device prior to use.Flushing was done prior to use, and the result was unremarkable.Other products being utilized with the device included circuits and extensions.The customer was using a competitor's extension lines with the catheter and a competitor's caps.There was no excessive force used on the device.The cleaning agent used on the device was octenisept, which was also typically utilized to clean the catheter in its entirety.The device was loosened/tightened manually by hand.Lavanide was in demand for ointment, which was utilized at the exit site.The wound dressing does not include any cleaning agents or antimicrobial properties.The cleaning agents are allowed to dry completely before ointment application.The cleaning agents were allowed to dry thoroughly before the area was dressed.The patients are not responsible for catheter maintenance, cleaning, or dressing changes.The cleaning agents were never switched over the life of the catheter and were never mixed.Sepsiderm was not used for cleaning catheters.There was no protocol change for cleaning agents used recently.The patient themselves was not using any type of cleaning agent or antibiotic on the catheters.The insertion site was treated prior to product placement.Besides the reported issue, there was a visible tear found on the product at the time of the event.As a remedial action and intervention, the arterial leg was used, and explantation was performed.The existing shunt could be punctured for further treatment, eliminating the need to implant a new catheter.There was no blood loss, and blood transfusion was not required.The catheter was in place for 4 months.There was no reported patient injury.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: d9, g3, h3, h6 h3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device and a photo were available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted one catheter, with a crack on the threads of its venous luer adapter.It was reported that the luer adapter was leaking.The reported issue was confirmed.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.Internal process improvements have been initiated to mitigate this issue.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.

• Brand Name: PALINDROME
• Common Device Name: CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, IMPLANTED, COATED
• Manufacturer (Section D): COVIDIEN LLC; 15 hampshire st; mansfield MA 02048
• Manufacturer (Section G): COVIDIEN LLC; 15 hampshire st; mansfield MA 02048
• Manufacturer Contact: justin ellis ; 8200 coral sea st ne; mounds view, MN 55112 ; 7635265677
• MDR Report Key: 22111273
• Report Number: 1282497-2025-00369
• Device Sequence Number: 14515718
• Product Code: NYU
• UDI-Device Identifier: 10884521158085
• UDI-Public: 10884521158085
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter Country: GM
• PMA/510(K) Number: K123196
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Device Implanted Year: 2025
• Device Explanted Year: 2025
• Serviced by Third Party (Y/N): N
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Other Health Care Professional
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 09/18/2025

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: No
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: Yes
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Model Number: 8888145044CP
• Device Catalogue Number: 8888145044CP
• Device Lot Number: 2418000177
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: Device Returned to Manufacturer
• Is the Reporter a Health Professional?: Yes
• Type of Report(Section G): Thirty-Day
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 05/14/2025
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: Not provided; 08/25/2025; 09/15/2025
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 05/29/2025
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 08/19/2025; 08/25/2025; 09/18/2025
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): Yes
• Date Device Manufactured: 08/07/2024
• Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N): Yes
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Initial
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Patient Age: 74 YR
• Patient Sex: Male
• Patient Weight: 68 KG