|
MENTOR TEXAS MENTOR MEMORYGEL BREAST IMPLANT; PROSTHESIS, BREAST, NONINFLATABLE, INTERNAL, SILICONE GEL-FILLED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
3508004BC |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360)
|
| Date of Event |
01/13/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: material rupture.Mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent breast reconstruction revision with two 750cc mentor cpx 3 breast tissue expander with suturing tabs.Post-operatively, the patient suffered right breast implant deflation.As a result, the patient underwent breast implant removal and replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2025.The replacement devices were mentor gel implants.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On june 2, 2025, mentor received additional information which indicated that the patient was actually also diagnosed with bilateral breasts deformities and disproportion.Along with the removal, the patient also underwent bilateral revision, bilateral breast fat grafting, bilateral breast liposuction, soft tissue reconstruction, and pocket capsulorrhaphy.This medwatch form is for the right breast prosthesis.The complications on the left breast will be reported under mrn: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On july 4, 2025, mentor received additional information indicating that the suspect medical devices are two 800cc mentor memorygel breast implant (catalog: 3508004bc lot: 5955411).The correct date of implantation was also provided and populated.A manufacturing record evaluation is in progress.Once completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.On july 10, 2025, the mentor failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On august 15, 2025, the product investigation was completed.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Device investigation summary: the product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned device revealed that the breast implant was found to be ruptured.In addition, the breast implant had an area of shell abrasion on the edges of the rupture.These findings are consistent with normal wear of the device.Shell abrasion suggests in-vivo folding or creasing of the device, which may be caused by continuous and sustained stresses to the device, such as an excessively small breast pocket or the folding or wrinkling of the shell within the breast pocket.In some cases, breast implants may also experience normal wear over time.As part of mentor's quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released according to approved specifications.Based on the results of this investigation, it was determined that the product met the manufacturing release criteria, and that normal wear may have caused the observed defect.No corrective and preventive action (capa) is required now.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|