|
The device was not returned for analysis.Production record and corrective and preventative actions (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar complaints from this lot.Based on the information provided, a definitive cause for the reported complaints could not be determined.Possible factors that may contribute to non-uniform balloon refold (winged) include, but not limited to, large balloon profile, deflation technique, multiple inflations.Possible factors that can contribute to difficult to remove/resistance with the introducer sheath post-inflation include, but are not limited to, loose balloon folds, guiding catheter lumen obstructions, kinks, bends, procedural technique, insufficient support or interactions with other devices.In this case, a conclusive cause for the reported complaints could not be determined since the device or component were not returned for analysis.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a lesion in the left peroneal artery.The 2.5x120mm armada 14 balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) was used on the procedure without issue; however, during removal of the bdc resistance was felt with the tip of the sheath.Therefore, the bdc, sheath and guide wire removed as a single unit.After removal the balloon was noted to be loosely folded.There was no adverse patient effect and no clinically significant delay reported in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|